Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparison of the adverse reactions associated with isosulfan blue versus methylene blue dye in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer

  • New York Presbyterian Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

185 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an established means of staging the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Recently, methylene blue dye has been shown to be an efficacious and cost-effective alternative to isosulfan blue. With the increasing popularity of SLNB, the potential complications of isosulfan blue use must be appreciated. Methods: A literature search for English language articles available on MEDLINE from 1985 to November 2002 using the search terms allergy, allergic reaction, anaphylactic reactions, anaphylaxis, blue dye, breast cancer, isosulfan blue, methylene blue, and sentinel lymph node biopsy identified 24 reports. Conclusions: The use of isosulfan blue due for SLNB is associated with a significant number of allergic reactions, some of which are life-threatening. Because methylene blue dye has been shown to be equally effective and does not pose a serious risk of serious allergic reactions, it offers an improved technique above isosulfan blue dye for SLNB.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)236-239
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume189
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2005

Keywords

  • Allergic reaction, Breast cancer
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Isosulfan blue
  • Methylene blue
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of the adverse reactions associated with isosulfan blue versus methylene blue dye in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this