A Comparison Study of Different State-of-Charge Balancing Strategies for Smart Battery Systems

Tingyang Meng; Zongli Lin; Yacov A. Shamash

doi:10.1109/ICCA51439.2020.9264531

A Comparison Study of Different State-of-Charge Balancing Strategies for Smart Battery Systems

Tingyang Meng
, Zongli Lin
, Yacov A. Shamash

Electrical Engineering

University of Virginia

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper we present and compare four different State-of-Charge (SoC) balancing strategies including continuous-time, discretized, event-triggered and self-triggered balancing strategies for Lithium smart battery systems. Under the assumption that the communication topology among smart battery units is connected and undirected, average SoC balancing can be achieved under all four balancing strategies. Compared to continuous-time strategies, discretized and event-triggered balancing strategies reduce the communication among battery units as well as the computation of controllers. Self-triggered strategies further relax the requirement of continuously monitoring the SoC of each unit and its neighbors. Simulation results are provided to verify the effectiveness and compare the differences of the four strategies.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA 2020
Publisher	IEEE Computer Society
Pages	1434-1439
Number of pages	6
ISBN (Electronic)	9781728190938
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCA51439.2020.9264531
State	Published - Oct 9 2020
Event	16th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA 2020 - Virtual, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan Duration: Oct 9 2020 → Oct 11 2020

Publication series

Name	IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA
Volume	2020-October
ISSN (Print)	1948-3449
ISSN (Electronic)	1948-3457

Conference

Conference	16th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA 2020
Country/Territory	Japan
City	Virtual, Sapporo, Hokkaido
Period	10/9/20 → 10/11/20

Access to Document

10.1109/ICCA51439.2020.9264531

Cite this

Meng, T., Lin, Z., & Shamash, Y. A. (2020). A Comparison Study of Different State-of-Charge Balancing Strategies for Smart Battery Systems. In 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA 2020 (pp. 1434-1439). Article 9264531 (IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA; Vol. 2020-October). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCA51439.2020.9264531

@inproceedings{5cbccc1c62024d2fa29c4975c10c7631,

title = "A Comparison Study of Different State-of-Charge Balancing Strategies for Smart Battery Systems",

abstract = "In this paper we present and compare four different State-of-Charge (SoC) balancing strategies including continuous-time, discretized, event-triggered and self-triggered balancing strategies for Lithium smart battery systems. Under the assumption that the communication topology among smart battery units is connected and undirected, average SoC balancing can be achieved under all four balancing strategies. Compared to continuous-time strategies, discretized and event-triggered balancing strategies reduce the communication among battery units as well as the computation of controllers. Self-triggered strategies further relax the requirement of continuously monitoring the SoC of each unit and its neighbors. Simulation results are provided to verify the effectiveness and compare the differences of the four strategies.",

author = "Tingyang Meng and Zongli Lin and Shamash, \{Yacov A.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 IEEE.; 16th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA 2020 ; Conference date: 09-10-2020 Through 11-10-2020",

year = "2020",

month = oct,

day = "9",

doi = "10.1109/ICCA51439.2020.9264531",

language = "English",

series = "IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA",

publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",

pages = "1434--1439",

booktitle = "2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA 2020",

}

Meng, T, Lin, Z & Shamash, YA 2020, A Comparison Study of Different State-of-Charge Balancing Strategies for Smart Battery Systems. in 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA 2020., 9264531, IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA, vol. 2020-October, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1434-1439, 16th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA 2020, Virtual, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, 10/9/20. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCA51439.2020.9264531

A Comparison Study of Different State-of-Charge Balancing Strategies for Smart Battery Systems. / Meng, Tingyang; Lin, Zongli; Shamash, Yacov A.
2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA 2020. IEEE Computer Society, 2020. p. 1434-1439 9264531 (IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA; Vol. 2020-October).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - A Comparison Study of Different State-of-Charge Balancing Strategies for Smart Battery Systems

AU - Meng, Tingyang

AU - Lin, Zongli

AU - Shamash, Yacov A.

PY - 2020/10/9

Y1 - 2020/10/9

N2 - In this paper we present and compare four different State-of-Charge (SoC) balancing strategies including continuous-time, discretized, event-triggered and self-triggered balancing strategies for Lithium smart battery systems. Under the assumption that the communication topology among smart battery units is connected and undirected, average SoC balancing can be achieved under all four balancing strategies. Compared to continuous-time strategies, discretized and event-triggered balancing strategies reduce the communication among battery units as well as the computation of controllers. Self-triggered strategies further relax the requirement of continuously monitoring the SoC of each unit and its neighbors. Simulation results are provided to verify the effectiveness and compare the differences of the four strategies.

AB - In this paper we present and compare four different State-of-Charge (SoC) balancing strategies including continuous-time, discretized, event-triggered and self-triggered balancing strategies for Lithium smart battery systems. Under the assumption that the communication topology among smart battery units is connected and undirected, average SoC balancing can be achieved under all four balancing strategies. Compared to continuous-time strategies, discretized and event-triggered balancing strategies reduce the communication among battery units as well as the computation of controllers. Self-triggered strategies further relax the requirement of continuously monitoring the SoC of each unit and its neighbors. Simulation results are provided to verify the effectiveness and compare the differences of the four strategies.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85098065118

U2 - 10.1109/ICCA51439.2020.9264531

DO - 10.1109/ICCA51439.2020.9264531

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85098065118

T3 - IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA

SP - 1434

EP - 1439

BT - 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA 2020

PB - IEEE Computer Society

T2 - 16th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, ICCA 2020

Y2 - 9 October 2020 through 11 October 2020

ER -

A Comparison Study of Different State-of-Charge Balancing Strategies for Smart Battery Systems

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this