Abstract
A contentious issue in the Minimalist literature is whether certain phenomena are best described in terms of features or constraints. Building on recent work in mathematical linguistics, I argue that constraints and features are interchangeable in Minimalist syntax. This does not invalidate the feature-constraint debate, though. Rather, the interdefinability of the two points out an unexpected loophole in the formalism that allows for massive overgeneration and produces incorrect typological predictions. At the same time, the feature-constraint equivalence can be helpful in plugging this loophole.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Glossa |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- Computational linguistics
- Generative capacity
- Minimalist grammars
- Model theoretic syntax
- Subcategorization
- Syntactic categories
- Typology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A computational guide to the dichotomy of features and constraints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver