Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Dialogue on Un/Precedented Pandemic Rhetorics

  • Ryan Mitchell
  • , Julie Homchick Crowe
  • , Sara Dicaglio
  • , Lisa Detora
  • , Brynn Fitzsimmons
  • , Tristin Brynn Hooker
  • , Lisa Keränen
  • , Michael Klein
  • , Melissa Nicolas
  • , Shaunak Sastry
  • Seattle University
  • Texas A&M University
  • Hofstra University
  • University of Alabama
  • University of Colorado Denver
  • James Madison University
  • Washington State University
  • University of Cincinnati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Inspired by conversations at the 2021 Rhetoric Society of America Institute workshop on Pandemic Rhetoric(s), this dialogue assembles graduate student, early-, midcareer, and established rhetoric of health and medicine (RHM) and critical health communication scholars to discuss a keyword that has structured political, social, and biomedical thinking about COVID-19: un/precedented. In identifying un/ precedented as an organizing temporal rhetoric for the pandemic, we interrogate how recurrent appeals to the pandemic’s novelty both allow for and limit our capacities to meet the pandemic’s tremendous exigencies head-on. Leveraging our unique scholarly and community commitments, we theorize how un/precedentedness 1) becomes complicit in government inaction, 2) (re)asserts conceptual and literal borders, 3) justifies state and national public health mandates, and 4) obscures other historical and contemporary pandemics. We conclude by offering possibilities for interdisciplinary and longitudinal research into the far-reaching effects of contagious disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-364
Number of pages30
JournalRhetoric of Health and Medicine
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 3 2023

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • novelty
  • pandemic rhetorics
  • temporality
  • unprecedentedness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Dialogue on Un/Precedented Pandemic Rhetorics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this