Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A multi-source feedback tool for measuring a subset of Pediatrics Milestones

  • The APPD LEARN—NBME Pediatrics Milestones Assessment Group
  • Longitudinal Educational Assessment Research Network
  • Association of Pediatric Program Directors
  • National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
  • University of Louisville
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Boston University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • University of Virginia
  • Phoenix Children's Hospital
  • Cincinnati Children’s Hospital
  • Vermont Children’s Hospital
  • University of Florida
  • Winthrop-University Hospital
  • Emory University
  • Inova Fairfax Hospital for Children
  • University of Texas System
  • Wright State University
  • Children’s National Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The Pediatrics Milestones Assessment Pilot employed a new multisource feedback (MSF) instrument to assess nine Pediatrics Milestones among interns and subinterns in the inpatient context. Objective: To report validity evidence for the MSF tool for informing milestone classification decisions. Methods: We obtained MSF instruments by different raters per learner per rotation. We present evidence for validity based on the unified validity framework. Results: One hundred and ninety two interns and 41 subinterns at 18 Pediatrics residency programs received a total of 1084 MSF forms from faculty (40%), senior residents (34%), nurses (22%), and other staff (4%). Variance in ratings was associated primarily with rater (32%) and learner (22%). The milestone factor structure fit data better than simpler structures. In domains except professionalism, ratings by nurses were significantly lower than those by faculty and ratings by other staff were significantly higher. Ratings were higher when the rater observed the learner for longer periods and had a positive global opinion of the learner. Ratings of interns and subinterns did not differ, except for ratings by senior residents. MSF-based scales correlated with summative milestone scores. Conclusion: We obtain moderately reliable MSF ratings of interns and subinterns in the inpatient context to inform some milestone assignments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)995-1002
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume38
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A multi-source feedback tool for measuring a subset of Pediatrics Milestones'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this