Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A pooled analysis of bladder cancer case-control studies evaluating smoking in men and women

  • Diana Puente
  • , Patricia Hartge
  • , Eberhard Greiser
  • , Kenneth P. Cantor
  • , Will D. King
  • , Carlos A. González
  • , Sylvaine Cordier
  • , Paolo Vineis
  • , Elsebeth Lynge
  • , Jenny Chang-Claude
  • , Stefano Porru
  • , Anastasia Tzonou
  • , Karl Heinz Jöckel
  • , Consol Serra
  • , Martine Hours
  • , Charles F. Lynch
  • , Ulrich Ranft
  • , Jürgen Wahrendorf
  • , Debra Silverman
  • , Francisco Fernandez
  • Paolo Boffetta, Manolis Kogevinas
  • Municipal Institute for Medical Research Hospital del Mar
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology
  • Queen's University Kingston
  • Institute Catala Oncologia
  • Université de Rennes
  • University of Turin
  • University of Copenhagen
  • German Cancer Research Center
  • University of Brescia
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie
  • Corporació Parc Taulí
  • Pompeu Fabra University
  • Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1
  • University of Iowa
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: A recent study suggested that risk of bladder cancer may be higher in women than in men who smoked comparable amounts of cigarettes. We pooled primary data from 14 case-control studies of bladder cancer from Europe and North America and evaluated differences in risk of smoking by gender. Methods: The pooled analysis included 8316 cases (21% women) and 17,406 controls (28% women) aged 30-79 years. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for smoking were adjusted for age and study. Exposure-response was evaluated in a stratified analysis by gender and by generalized additive models. Results: The odds ratios for current smokers compared to nonsmokers were 3.9 (95% CI 3.5-4.3) for males and 3.6 (3.1-4.1) for females. In 11 out of 14 studies, ORs were slightly higher in men. ORs for current smoking were similar for men (OR = 3.4) and women (OR = 3.7) in North America, while in Europe men (OR = 5.3) had higher ORs than women (OR = 3.9). ORs increased with duration and intensity in both genders and the exposure-response patterns were remarkably similar between genders. Conclusion: These results do not support the hypothesis that women have a higher relative risk of smoking-related bladder cancer than men.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-79
Number of pages9
JournalCancer Causes and Control
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer
  • Case-control studies
  • Gender differences
  • Pooled analysis
  • Tobacco smoke

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A pooled analysis of bladder cancer case-control studies evaluating smoking in men and women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this