Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A randomized, blinded, multicenter trial of a gentamicin vancomycin gel (DFA-02) in patients undergoing abdominal surgery

  • Elliott Bennett-Guerrero
  • , Scott M. Berry
  • , Sergio D. Bergese
  • , Phillip R. Fleshner
  • , Harold S. Minkowitz
  • , Alvaro M. Segura-Vasi
  • , Kamal M.F. Itani
  • , Karen W. Henderson
  • , Felicia P. Rackowski
  • , Laura H. Aberle
  • , Martin E. Stryjewski
  • , G. Ralph Corey
  • , Kent S. Allenby
  • CRC of Jackson
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Memorial Hermann Healthcare System
  • Shoals Clinical Research Associates, LLC
  • Harvard University
  • Duke University
  • Inc.
  • Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background SI is a significant medical problem. DFA-02 is an investigational bioresorbable modified release gel consisting of both gentamicin (16.8 mg/mL) and vancomycin (18.8 mg/mL). A Phase 2a study, where the drug was applied during surgical incision closure, suggested safety and tolerability but was not designed to assess its efficacy. Study design In a Phase 2b randomized, blinded trial patients undergoing abdominal, primarily colorectal, surgery were randomized (4:1:1) to one of three study arms: DFA-02, matching placebo gel, or standard of care (SOC) involving irrigation of the wound with normal saline. The DFA-02 and placebo gel groups received up to 20 mL of study drug inserted above the fascia during wound closure, and were treated in a double-blind manner; the SOC group was treated in a single-blind manner. The primary endpoint was SSI (adjudicated centrally by a blinded committee) through postoperative day 30. Results Overall, 445 subjects (intention-to-treat) were randomized at 35 centers with 425 subjects completing the study and being evaluable. There were 67 SSIs (15.8%): 64.2% superficial, 7.5% deep, and 28.4% organ space. The incidence of SSI was not statistically significantly different between the DFA-02 and the placebo gel/SOC arms combined, 42/287 = 14.6% vs 25/138 = 18.1% (p = 0.36), respectively. Rehospitalization within 30 days was also similar between study groups (DFA-02 28.6%, placebo gel 21.4%, SOC 27.3%). Conclusion In this multicenter, blinded, randomized trial with central adjudication, the gentamicin/vancomycin gel was not associated with a significant reduction in SSI. Summary Patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomized to one of three study arms: DFA-02 gel consisting of both gentamicin and vancomycin, matching placebo gel, or standard of care (SOC). Of 425 patients completing the study at 35 sites the gentamicin/vancomycin gel was not associated with a significant reduction in SSI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1003-1009
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume213
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Gentamicin
  • Surgical site infection
  • Topical
  • Vancomycin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized, blinded, multicenter trial of a gentamicin vancomycin gel (DFA-02) in patients undergoing abdominal surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this