Abstract
Two large cohort studies of members of US unions in the trucking industries provided some evidence of an increased risk of lung cancer. However, no increased risk was reported in comparisons with an external (unexposed) population, the evidence of an association rests on the results of analyses by duration of employment, or by estimated exposure to elemental carbon. These estimates are subjects to uncertainties and potential misclassification bias. In addition, residual confounding by tobacco smoking and by other occupational exposures cannot be excluded. The hypothesis of carcinogenicity of diesel exhaust (DE) is biologically plausible; an lARC Working Group has recently concluded that the evidence is sufficient to classify DE as human carcinogen. This review of studies of truck drivers illustrates the problems of epidemiology of DE-exposed workers, and stresses the need for careful consideration to potential sources of bias and confounding.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 365-370 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| State | Published - Jul 2012 |
Keywords
- Diesel engine exhaust
- Epidemiology
- Lung cancer
- Truck drivers
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A review of cancer risk in the trucking industry, with emphasis on exposure to diesel exhaust'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver