Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A transfer-appropriate processing account of context effects in word-fragment completion

  • Boston College
  • University of Washington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

The claim that priming on implicit memory tasks such as word-fragment completion is sensitive to context effects was tested by using homographs (e.g., board) to manipulate context. On the basis of previous findings, it was assumed that presentation of only the perceptual cue at test (_oa_d) should activate the dominant meaning, thereby creating the same context for homographs encoded for their dominant encoding and a different context for homographs encoded for their nondominant meaning. As expected, little or no effect of varying context was observed on a perceptual implicit task (Experiments 1-2B). When explicit retrieval instructions were given in Experiment 3, same-context encoding led to greater recall of homographs from word-fragment cues relative to different-context encoding. These results are consistent with the predictions of the transfer-appropriate-processing view because little advantage for the same-context condition was obtained in implicit tests in the absence of conceptual cues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)993-1004
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A transfer-appropriate processing account of context effects in word-fragment completion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this