Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Absorption of solar radiation by clouds: Observations versus models

  • R. D. Cess
  • , M. H. Zhang
  • , P. Minnis
  • , L. Corsetti
  • , E. G. Dutton
  • , B. W. Forgan
  • , D. P. Garber
  • , W. L. Gates
  • , J. J. Hack
  • , E. F. Harrison
  • , X. Jing
  • , J. T. Kiehl
  • , C. N. Long
  • , J. J. Morcrette
  • , G. L. Potter
  • , V. Ramanathan
  • , B. Subasilar
  • , C. H. Whitlock
  • , D. F. Young
  • , Y. Zhou
  • Stony Brook University
  • NASA Langley Research Center
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Bureau of Meteorology Australia
  • Lockheed Engineering and Science Company
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
  • University of California at San Diego

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

383 Scopus citations

Abstract

There has been a long history of unexplained anomalous absorption of solar radiation by clouds. Collocated satellite and surface measurements of solar radiation at five geographically diverse locations showed significant solar absorption by clouds, resulting in about 25 watts per square meter more global-mean absorption by the cloudy atmosphere than predicted by theoretical models. It has often been suggested that tropospheric aerosols could increase cloud absorption. But these aerosols are temporally and spatially heterogeneous, whereas the observed cloud absorption is remarkably invariant with respect to season and location. Although its physical cause is unknown, enhanced cloud absorption substantially alters our understanding of the atmosphere's energy budget.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)496-499
Number of pages4
JournalScience
Volume267
Issue number5197
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Absorption of solar radiation by clouds: Observations versus models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this