TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery
T2 - barriers to adoption and equitable access
AU - SAGES HPB Committee
AU - Armstrong, Misha
AU - Lu, Pamela
AU - Wang, Jane
AU - El-Hayek, Kevin
AU - Cleary, Sean
AU - Asbun, Horacio
AU - Alseidi, Adnan
AU - Tran Cao, Hop S.
AU - Wei, Alice C.
AU - Sucandy, Iswanto
AU - Soubrane, Olivier
AU - Simoneau, Eve
AU - Shah, Mihir M.
AU - Ross, Sharona
AU - Polanco, Patricio M.
AU - Pecorelli, Nicolò
AU - Patel, Ankit D.
AU - Onkendi, Edwin
AU - Kwon, David
AU - Kutlu, Onur
AU - Hogg, Melissa
AU - Gleisner, Ana
AU - Georgakis, Georgios
AU - Fretland, Åsmund Avdem
AU - Ayloo, Subhashini
AU - Asbun, Domenech
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Background: Despite a growing body of literature supporting the safety of robotic hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) procedures, the adoption of minimally invasive techniques in HPB surgery has been slow compared to other specialties. We aimed to identify barriers to implementing robotic assisted surgery (RAS) in HPB and present a framework that highlights opportunities to improve adoption. Methods: A modified nominal group technique guided by a 13-question framework was utilized. The meeting session was guided by senior authors, and field notes were also collected. Results were reviewed and free text responses were analyzed for major themes. A follow-up priority setting survey was distributed to all participants based on meeting results. Results: Twenty three surgeons with varying robotic HPB experience from different practice settings participated in the discussion. The majority of surgeons identified operating room efficiency, having a dedicated operating room team, and the overall hospital culture and openness to innovation as important facilitators of implementing a RAS program. In contrast, cost, capacity building, disparities/risk of regionalization, lack of evidence, and time/effort were identified as the most significant barriers. When asked to prioritize the most important issues to be addressed, participants noted access and availability of the robot as the most important issue, followed by institutional support, cost, quality of supporting evidence, and need for robotic training. Conclusions: This study reports surgeons’ perceptions of major barriers to equitable access and increased implementation of robotic HPB surgery. To overcome such barriers, defining key resources, adopting innovative solutions, and developing better methods of collecting long term data should be the top priorities. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)
AB - Background: Despite a growing body of literature supporting the safety of robotic hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) procedures, the adoption of minimally invasive techniques in HPB surgery has been slow compared to other specialties. We aimed to identify barriers to implementing robotic assisted surgery (RAS) in HPB and present a framework that highlights opportunities to improve adoption. Methods: A modified nominal group technique guided by a 13-question framework was utilized. The meeting session was guided by senior authors, and field notes were also collected. Results were reviewed and free text responses were analyzed for major themes. A follow-up priority setting survey was distributed to all participants based on meeting results. Results: Twenty three surgeons with varying robotic HPB experience from different practice settings participated in the discussion. The majority of surgeons identified operating room efficiency, having a dedicated operating room team, and the overall hospital culture and openness to innovation as important facilitators of implementing a RAS program. In contrast, cost, capacity building, disparities/risk of regionalization, lack of evidence, and time/effort were identified as the most significant barriers. When asked to prioritize the most important issues to be addressed, participants noted access and availability of the robot as the most important issue, followed by institutional support, cost, quality of supporting evidence, and need for robotic training. Conclusions: This study reports surgeons’ perceptions of major barriers to equitable access and increased implementation of robotic HPB surgery. To overcome such barriers, defining key resources, adopting innovative solutions, and developing better methods of collecting long term data should be the top priorities. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)
KW - Access
KW - Equity
KW - Hepatopancreatobiliary
KW - Robotics
KW - Surgery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85201287883
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-024-11078-1
DO - 10.1007/s00464-024-11078-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 39117957
AN - SCOPUS:85201287883
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 38
SP - 5643
EP - 5650
JO - Surgical Endoscopy
JF - Surgical Endoscopy
IS - 10
ER -