Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Analysis of human spermatozoal fertilizing ability using zona-free ova

  • B. J. Rogers
  • , H. van Campen
  • , M. Ueno
  • , H. Lambert
  • , R. Bronson
  • , R. Hale
  • University of Hawai'i at Mānoa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

255 Scopus citations

Abstract

An in vitro fertilization assay employing zona-free hamster eggs was used to analyze human spermatozoal fertilizing ability. Human spermatozoa were preincubated for 18 to 20 hr in Biggers, Whitten, and Whittingham's medium (1971) at a concentration of 1 x 107 sperm/ml prior to the addition of zona-free superovulated hamster eggs. Eggs were examined microscopically 2 hours later for evidence of swelling or decondensing sperm heads in the cytoplasm. A total of 6266 eggs were examined in assay for both suspected fertile and infertile donors; 50 eggs/sample were examined. The percentage of fertilization was found to range from 14% to 100% in the suspected fertile group with an average of 56.3%. The sperm concentration in this fertile group ranged from 22 to 303 million/ml with an average of 114. The suspected infertile samples yielded fertilization rates of 10% or less and an average count of 50.6 million/ml. These data suggest that human spermatozoa fuse with the vitelline membrane of zona-free hamster eggs and decondense with varying efficiencies. The percentage of fertilization in this cross-species system did not show a significant correlation with sperm concentration or motility. However, suspected infertile samples always yielded 10% or less fertilization in this assay. This method may have potential value as a diagnostic tool in evaluating human spermatozoal fertilization of human eggs in vitro.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)664-670
Number of pages7
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1979

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of human spermatozoal fertilizing ability using zona-free ova'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this