Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Analysis of inequality in nanomedicine using clinical trials and disease burden

  • University of Central Florida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: This study explores the impact nanomedicine will have on global health, poverty and inequality. Materials & methods: Using a nanotechnology search strategy, the team extracted nanotechnology clinical trials (CT) from the dataset clinicaltrials.gov. The team then combined CT with information about burden of disease data from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. Finally, the team ran regression analyses to determine whether nanotechnology CT are decreasing inequality compared with non-nanotechnology CT. Results & conclusion: Nanomedicine and non-nanomedicine CT follow similar research patterns. In general, nanomedicine is neither increasing nor decreasing the technological gap between countries in the global North and South.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1745-1757
Number of pages13
JournalNanomedicine
Volume14
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Keywords

  • bibliometrics
  • clinical trials
  • disease burden
  • inclusive innovation
  • inequality
  • nanomedicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of inequality in nanomedicine using clinical trials and disease burden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this