Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are summary statistics enough? Evidence for the importance of shape in guiding visual search

  • Stony Brook University
  • University of South Carolina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Peripheral vision outside the focus of attention may rely on summary statistics. We used a gaze-contingent paradigm to directly test this assumption by asking whether search performance differed between targets and statistically-matched visualizations of the same targets. Four-object search displays included one statistically-matched object that was replaced by an unaltered version of the object during the first eye movement. Targets were designated by previews, which were never altered. Two types of statistically-matched objects were tested: One that maintained global shape and one that did not. Differences in guidance were found between targets and statistically-matched objects when shape was not preserved, suggesting that they were not informationally equivalent. Responses were also slower after target fixation when shape was not preserved, suggesting an extrafoveal processing of the target that again used shape information. We conclude that summary statistics must include some global shape information to approximate the peripheral information used during search.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)595-609
Number of pages15
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Keywords

  • Extrafoveal processing
  • Eye movements
  • Gaze contingent
  • Shape
  • Summary statistics
  • Visual search guidance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are summary statistics enough? Evidence for the importance of shape in guiding visual search'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this