TY - JOUR
T1 - Arrhythmia Burden and Clinical Responses Under Continuous Monitoring in Heart Failure
AU - ALLEVIATE-HF Investigators
AU - Kahwash, Rami
AU - Butler, Javed
AU - Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
AU - Zhang, David
AU - Dukes, Jonathan
AU - Reddy, Madhu
AU - Kaplan, Rachel M.
AU - Amin, Anish
AU - Kanwar, Rahul
AU - Sarkar, Shantanu
AU - Laager, Verla
AU - Wehking, Jennifer
AU - Van Dorn, Brian
AU - Gerritse, Bart
AU - Patel, Nirav
AU - Laechelt, Aimee
AU - Zile, Michael R.
AU - Nair, Devi
AU - Chaudhry, Sunit Preet
AU - Galani, Ruple
AU - Heatherly, Steven
AU - Verma, Sumit
AU - Mester, Stephen
AU - Panico, Ambrose
AU - Dukes, Jonathan
AU - Bertolet, Barry
AU - Goldstein, Matthew
AU - Rhee, Benjamin
AU - Gharib, Elie
AU - Mohammed, Selma
AU - Garcia, Hector
AU - Sayer, Gabriel
AU - Lambert, Cameron
AU - Sangrigoli, Renee
AU - Metzl, Mark
AU - Lamba, Sumant
AU - Chalasani, Prasad
AU - Cammarata, Michael
AU - Lyons, James
AU - Malik, Amir
AU - Jackson, Gregory
AU - Newton, David
AU - Gravelin, Laura
AU - Brown, Eddie
AU - Obi, Chike
AU - Sanchez, Robert
AU - Morris, Kent
AU - Rommel, John
AU - Basuray, Anupam
AU - Skopicki, Hal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
PY - 2026/6/30
Y1 - 2026/6/30
N2 - Background: Arrhythmia burden in ambulatory patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) without cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is not well defined, and it remains uncertain whether device-guided remote congestion management modifies arrhythmia occurrence. Objectives: The goal was to assess whether arrhythmia burden differed between randomized congestion-management strategies and characterize the occurrences and associations of insertable cardiac monitor (ICM)-detected arrhythmias with therapeutic actions and clinical events. Methods: In ALLEVIATE-HF, patients with NYHA functional class II-III HF with any ejection fraction (EF) and a recent HF event, without prior CIEDs, underwent ICM implantation and were randomized to ICM-guided, physician-directed, nurse-facilitated congestion management or usual care. In both arms, arrhythmia data were accessible to investigators, and arrhythmia-related management was clinician directed. Arrythmia occurrence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Associations with therapeutic interventions and clinical events were evaluated using time-varying Cox models. Results: The analysis included 711 patients (mean age 70.5 ± 10.4 years; 45.7% women; mean follow-up 17.3 ± 8.9 months); 67.9% had HF with preserved EF, and 60.2% were NYHA functional class II at baseline. During the 13-month randomized phase, arrhythmia occurrence rate did not differ between the study arms. The 3-year overall occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was 66.6%, with an incidence of new-onset AF of 25.4%. Bradyarrhythmia occurred in 47.1% of patients, and ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF) in 20.1%. ICM-recorded arrhythmia was associated with subsequent increase in arrhythmia-related interventions (HR: 3.81; VT/VF and VT/VF-related interventions, HR: 7.04; AF and AF-related interventions, HR: 3.28; bradyarrhythmia and bradyarrhythmia-related interventions, HR: 7.22; all P < 0.001). ICM-recorded arrhythmia was associated with increased risk of all-cause hospitalization (HR: 1.79; P < 0.001) and HF events (HR: 1.69; P = 0.003). Therapeutic CIED implantation and ablation occurred in 22.7% and 26.1%, respectively. Bradyarrhythmias were more common in patients with EF ≥50%, whereas VT/VF occurred more frequently in EF <50%; AF occurrence was similar between EF groups. Conclusions: In ambulatory patients with recent symptomatic HF events, arrhythmia burden was not modified by the study protocol–directed, congestion-management strategy. Continuous ICM monitoring revealed a high burden of clinically meaningful arrhythmias that were associated with clinical events and therapeutic interventions.
AB - Background: Arrhythmia burden in ambulatory patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) without cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is not well defined, and it remains uncertain whether device-guided remote congestion management modifies arrhythmia occurrence. Objectives: The goal was to assess whether arrhythmia burden differed between randomized congestion-management strategies and characterize the occurrences and associations of insertable cardiac monitor (ICM)-detected arrhythmias with therapeutic actions and clinical events. Methods: In ALLEVIATE-HF, patients with NYHA functional class II-III HF with any ejection fraction (EF) and a recent HF event, without prior CIEDs, underwent ICM implantation and were randomized to ICM-guided, physician-directed, nurse-facilitated congestion management or usual care. In both arms, arrhythmia data were accessible to investigators, and arrhythmia-related management was clinician directed. Arrythmia occurrence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Associations with therapeutic interventions and clinical events were evaluated using time-varying Cox models. Results: The analysis included 711 patients (mean age 70.5 ± 10.4 years; 45.7% women; mean follow-up 17.3 ± 8.9 months); 67.9% had HF with preserved EF, and 60.2% were NYHA functional class II at baseline. During the 13-month randomized phase, arrhythmia occurrence rate did not differ between the study arms. The 3-year overall occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was 66.6%, with an incidence of new-onset AF of 25.4%. Bradyarrhythmia occurred in 47.1% of patients, and ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF) in 20.1%. ICM-recorded arrhythmia was associated with subsequent increase in arrhythmia-related interventions (HR: 3.81; VT/VF and VT/VF-related interventions, HR: 7.04; AF and AF-related interventions, HR: 3.28; bradyarrhythmia and bradyarrhythmia-related interventions, HR: 7.22; all P < 0.001). ICM-recorded arrhythmia was associated with increased risk of all-cause hospitalization (HR: 1.79; P < 0.001) and HF events (HR: 1.69; P = 0.003). Therapeutic CIED implantation and ablation occurred in 22.7% and 26.1%, respectively. Bradyarrhythmias were more common in patients with EF ≥50%, whereas VT/VF occurred more frequently in EF <50%; AF occurrence was similar between EF groups. Conclusions: In ambulatory patients with recent symptomatic HF events, arrhythmia burden was not modified by the study protocol–directed, congestion-management strategy. Continuous ICM monitoring revealed a high burden of clinically meaningful arrhythmias that were associated with clinical events and therapeutic interventions.
KW - arrhythmia
KW - arrhythmia detection
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - heart failure
KW - insertable cardiac monitor
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105041405839
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.03.174
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.03.174
M3 - Article
C2 - 42201276
AN - SCOPUS:105041405839
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 87
SP - 3611
EP - 3628
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 25
ER -