Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Avoiding Backlash or Proving One’s Manhood? Beliefs About Gender Differences in Negotiation

  • TU Dortmund University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gender differences in negotiation are typically explained by processes that concern women (e.g., women anticipate backlash for assertive behavior). Research has begun to suggest that processes that concern men (e.g., men want to be seen as “real” men) also help to explain gender differences. However, these 2 approaches typically remain disconnected. Thus, we examined both types of processes in 3 studies examining people’s beliefs about the causes of gender differences in negotiation (total N = 931). Our studies showed that people endorsed to a similar, and sometimes even greater, extent processes that concern men as underlying gender differences in negotiation. Moreover, people’s beliefs about the causes of gender differences in negotiation were related to perceptions of the effectiveness of different diversity initiatives (i.e., interventions to reduce inequities) and willingness to support them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-110
Number of pages30
JournalGroup Decision and Negotiation
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Gender gap
  • Masculinity
  • Negotiation
  • Sex

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Avoiding Backlash or Proving One’s Manhood? Beliefs About Gender Differences in Negotiation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this