Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Blind prediction of homo- and hetero-protein complexes: The CASP13-CAPRI experiment

  • Marc F. Lensink
  • , Guillaume Brysbaert
  • , Nurul Nadzirin
  • , Sameer Velankar
  • , Raphaël A.G. Chaleil
  • , Tereza Gerguri
  • , Paul A. Bates
  • , Elodie Laine
  • , Alessandra Carbone
  • , Sergei Grudinin
  • , Ren Kong
  • , Ran Ran Liu
  • , Xi Ming Xu
  • , Hang Shi
  • , Shan Chang
  • , Miriam Eisenstein
  • , Agnieszka Karczynska
  • , Cezary Czaplewski
  • , Emilia Lubecka
  • , Agnieszka Lipska
  • Paweł Krupa, Magdalena Mozolewska, Łukasz Golon, Sergey Samsonov, Adam Liwo, Silvia Crivelli, Guillaume Pagès, Mikhail Karasikov, Maria Kadukova, Yumeng Yan, Sheng You Huang, Mireia Rosell, Luis A. Rodríguez-Lumbreras, Miguel Romero-Durana, Lucía Díaz-Bueno, Juan Fernandez-Recio, Charles Christoffer, Genki Terashi, Woong Hee Shin, Tunde Aderinwale, Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subraman, Daisuke Kihara, Dima Kozakov, Sandor Vajda, Kathryn Porter, Dzmitry Padhorny, Israel Desta, Dmitri Beglov, Mikhail Ignatov, Sergey Kotelnikov, Iain H. Moal, David W. Ritchie, Isaure Chauvot de Beauchêne, Bernard Maigret, Marie Dominique Devignes, Maria E. Ruiz Echartea, Didier Barradas-Bautista, Zhen Cao, Luigi Cavallo, Romina Oliva, Yue Cao, Yang Shen, Minkyung Baek, Taeyong Park, Hyeonuk Woo, Chaok Seok, Merav Braitbard, Lirane Bitton, Dina Scheidman-Duhovny, Justas Dapkūnas, Kliment Olechnovič, Česlovas Venclovas, Petras J. Kundrotas, Saveliy Belkin, Devlina Chakravarty, Varsha D. Badal, Ilya A. Vakser, Thom Vreven, Sweta Vangaveti, Tyler Borrman, Zhiping Weng, Johnathan D. Guest, Ragul Gowthaman, Brian G. Pierce, Xianjin Xu, Rui Duan, Liming Qiu, Jie Hou, Benjamin Ryan Merideth, Zhiwei Ma, Jianlin Cheng, Xiaoqin Zou, Panagiotis I. Koukos, Jorge Roel-Touris, Francesco Ambrosetti, Cunliang Geng, Jörg Schaarschmidt, Mikael E. Trellet, Adrien S.J. Melquiond, Li Xue, Brian Jiménez-García, Charlotte W. van Noort, Rodrigo V. Honorato, Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin, Shoshana J. Wodak
  • Université de Lille
  • Wellcome Trust
  • The Francis Crick Institute
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Institut universitaire de France
  • Université Grenoble Alpes
  • Jiangsu University of Technology
  • Weizmann Institute of Science
  • University of Gdańsk
  • Institute of Physics of the Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Institute of Computer Science of the Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Korea Institute for Advanced Study
  • University of California at Davis
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Department of Earth Sciences
  • Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV-CSIC)
  • Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona (IBMB-CSIC)
  • Purdue University
  • Boston University
  • Stony Brook University
  • Université de Lorraine
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
  • University of Naples Parthenope
  • Texas A&M University
  • Seoul National University
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Vilnius University
  • University of Kansas
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • University of Missouri
  • Utrecht University
  • Flanders Institute for Biotechnology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

105 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present the results for CAPRI Round 46, the third joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of 20 targets including 14 homo-oligomers and 6 heterocomplexes. Eight of the homo-oligomer targets and one heterodimer comprised proteins that could be readily modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank, often available for the full assembly. The remaining 11 targets comprised 5 homodimers, 3 heterodimers, and two higher-order assemblies. These were more difficult to model, as their prediction mainly involved “ab-initio” docking of subunit models derived from distantly related templates. A total of ~30 CAPRI groups, including 9 automatic servers, submitted on average ~2000 models per target. About 17 groups participated in the CAPRI scoring rounds, offered for most targets, submitting ~170 models per target. The prediction performance, measured by the fraction of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted across all predictors groups, was very good to excellent for the nine easy targets. Poorer performance was achieved by predictors for the 11 difficult targets, with medium and high quality models submitted for only 3 of these targets. A similar performance “gap” was displayed by scorer groups, highlighting yet again the unmet challenge of modeling the conformational changes of the protein components that occur upon binding or that must be accounted for in template-based modeling. Our analysis also indicates that residues in binding interfaces were less well predicted in this set of targets than in previous Rounds, providing useful insights for directions of future improvements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1200-1221
Number of pages22
JournalProteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics
Volume87
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

Keywords

  • blind prediction
  • CAPRI
  • CASP
  • docking
  • oligomeric state
  • protein assemblies
  • protein complexes
  • protein-protein interaction
  • template-based modeling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Blind prediction of homo- and hetero-protein complexes: The CASP13-CAPRI experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this