Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bone response to hydroxyapatites with open porosity of animal origin (porcine [OsteoBiol®mp3] and bovine [Endobon®]): A radiological and histomorphometric study

  • Mapiedad P. Ramírez-Fernández
  • , Jose Luis Calvo-Guirado
  • , Rafael Arcesio Delgado-Ruiz
  • , José Eduardo Maté-Sánchez del Val
  • , Vicente Vicente-Ortega
  • , Luis Meseguer-Olmos
  • University of Murcia
  • Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To carry out a radiological and histomorphometric evaluation of bone response to two xenografts of animal origin, one porcine, and the other bovine, inserted in rabbits' tibiae. Material and methods: Twenty New Zealand rabbits weighing 3900-4500g were used. Twenty bovine bone grafts (Endobon®) in granulated form of 500-1000μm granulometry were inserted in the proximal metaphyseal area of the animals' right tibia, and 20 porcine bone grafts (OsteoBiol®mp3) in granulated form of 600-1000μm granulometry were inserted in the proximal metaphyseal area of the animals' left tibia. Following graft insertion, the animals were sacrificed in four groups of five, after 1, 2, 3 and 4 months, respectively. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken. Samples were processed for observation under light microscopy. Histomorphometric measurements were presented as mean values ± standard deviations. Results: At 4 months after treatment, the bone defects displayed radiological images that showed complete repair of osseous defects. Histomorphometric evaluation showed that for the porcine xenograft, the study averages for newly formed bone represented 22.8 ± 1.8%, for residual graft material 23.6 ± 3% and for connective tissue 53.5 ± 2.5%, while for the bovine xenograft newly formed bone represented 23.1 ± 1.8%, residual graft material 39.4 ± 3% and non-mineralized connective tissue 37.5 ± 2.5%. Conclusions: The biomaterials assessed in the study were shown to be biocompatible and osteoconductive. Collagenized porcine xenografts proved more resorbable than bovine xenografts. Both can be used as possible bone substitutes without interfering with normal reparative bone processes..

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)767-773
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Volume22
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Keywords

  • Biomaterial
  • Bone graft
  • Bovine graft
  • Bovine xenograft
  • Porcine graft
  • Porcine xenograft
  • Xenografts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bone response to hydroxyapatites with open porosity of animal origin (porcine [OsteoBiol®mp3] and bovine [Endobon®]): A radiological and histomorphometric study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this