Abstract
Two studies examine whether the workplace motherhood penalty and fatherhood bonus are better conceived, respectively, as a caregiver penalty and breadwinner bonus. Participants acting as employers structured offers for married female or male job candidates with children. In Study 1, participants assumed “mother = caregiver” and “father = breadwinner.” These assumptions moderated significantly higher salary offers to fathers and more (explicitly career-dampening) flexible schedules to mothers. Study 2 manipulated family roles (nonparent, parent-unspecified role, parent-breadwinner, and parent-caregiver). Supporting a breadwinner bonus, the female candidate fared best in salary and leadership training offers when labeled a breadwinner (vs. caregiver and unspecified role), equaling a male breadwinner’s offer. A caregiver penalty decreased salary for caregivers of both sexes and leadership training for women (compared to breadwinners) but not men. Thus, the motherhood penalty can become a breadwinner bonus if mothers present themselves as family breadwinners.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 780-788 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Social Psychological and Personality Science |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2017 |
Keywords
- fatherhood bonus
- gender stereotypes
- motherhood penalty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Breadwinner Bonus and Caregiver Penalty in Workplace Rewards for Men and Women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver