Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

CDC-reported assisted reproductive technology live-birth rates may mislead the public

  • Vitaly A. Kushnir
  • , Jennifer Choi
  • , Sarah K. Darmon
  • , David F. Albertini
  • , David H. Barad
  • , Norbert Gleicher
  • The Center for Human Reproduction
  • Wake Forest University
  • Wyckoff Heights Medical Center
  • Rockefeller University
  • Foundation for Reproductive Medicine
  • Medical University of Vienna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publicly reports assisted reproductive technology live-birth rates (LBR) for each US fertility clinic under legal mandate. The 2014 CDC report excluded 35,406 of 184,527 (19.2%) autologous assisted reproductive technology cycles that involved embryo or oocyte banking from LBR calculations. This study calculated 2014 total clinic LBR for all patients utilizing autologous oocytes two ways: including all initiated assisted reproductive technology cycles or excluding banking cycles, as done by the CDC. The main limitation of this analysis is the CDC report did not differentiate between cycles involving long-term banking of embryos or oocytes for fertility preservation from cycles involving short-term embryo banking. Twenty-seven of 458 (6%) clinics reported over 40% of autologous cycles involved banking, collectively performing 12% of all US assisted reproductive technology cycles. LBR in these outlier clinics calculated by the CDC method, was higher than the other 94% of clinics (33.1% versus 31.1%). However, recalculated LBR including banking cycles in the outlier clinics was lower than the other 94% of clinics (15.5% versus 26.6%). LBR calculated by the two methods increasingly diverged based on proportion of banking cycles performed by each clinic reaching 4.5-fold, thereby, potentially misleading the public.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-164
Number of pages4
JournalReproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2017

Keywords

  • Assisted reproductive technology
  • Health care outcomes
  • Live-birth rates
  • Public reporting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CDC-reported assisted reproductive technology live-birth rates may mislead the public'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this