Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ceramic Implant Rehabilitation: Consensus Statements from Joint Congress for Ceramic Implantology: Consensus Statements on Ceramic Implant

  • Etyene Schnurr
  • , Mathias Sperlich
  • , Amerian Sones
  • , George E. Romanos
  • , J. L. Rutkowski
  • , Dirk U. Duddeck
  • , Jörg Neugebauer
  • , Wael Att
  • , Markus Sperlich
  • , Karl Ulrich Volz
  • , Shahram Ghanaati
  • Ceramic and Biological Dentistry Foundation
  • Universidade Federal Fluminense
  • Stony Brook University
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • CleanImplant Foundation
  • University of Cologne
  • Tufts University
  • Swiss Biohealth Clinic
  • Goethe University Frankfurt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The objectives of the study group focused on the following main topics related to the performance of 1- and 2-piece ceramic implants: defining bone-implant-contact percentages and its measurement methods, evaluating the pink esthetic score as an esthetic outcome parameter after immediate implantation, recognizing the different results of ceramic implant designs as redefined by the German Association of Oral Implantology, incorporating the patient report outcome measure to include satisfaction and improvement in oral health–related quality of life, and conducting preclinical studies to address existing gaps in ceramic implants. During the Joint Congress for Ceramic Implantology (2022), the study group evaluated 17 clinical trials published between 2015 and 2021. After extensive discussions and multiple closed sessions, consensus statements and recommendations were developed, incorporating all approved modifications. A 1-piece implant design features a coronal part that is fused to the implant body or interfaces with the postabutment restoration platform, undergoing transmucosal healing. Long-term evaluations of this implant design are supported by established favorable clinical evidence. Inaccuracies in the pink esthetic score and bone-implant-contact percentages were managed by establishing control groups for preclinical studies and randomizing clinical trials. The patient-reported outcome measures were adjusted to include an individual visual analog scale, collected from each clinical study, that quantified improved oral health and quality of life. Preclinical investigations should focus on examining the spread of ceramic debris and the impact of heat generation on tissue and cellular levels during drilling. Further technical advancements should prioritize wound management and developing safe drilling protocols.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)435-445
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Oral Implantology
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2024

Keywords

  • bone-implant-contact
  • ceramic implants
  • heat generation
  • immediate implantation
  • pink esthetic score
  • visual analogue scale

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ceramic Implant Rehabilitation: Consensus Statements from Joint Congress for Ceramic Implantology: Consensus Statements on Ceramic Implant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this