Abstract
Conjoint analysis is a family of techniques that originated in psychology and later became popular in market research. The main objective of conjoint analysis is to measure an individual's or a population's preferences on a class of options that can be described by parameters and their levels. We consider preference data obtained in choice-based conjoint analysis studies, where one observes test persons' choices on small subsets of the options. There are many ways to analyze choice-based conjoint analysis data. Here we discuss the intuition behind a classification based approach, and compare this approach to one based on statistical assumptions (discrete choice models) and to a regression approach. Our comparison on real and synthetic data indicates that the classification approach outperforms the discrete choice models.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Preference Learning |
| Publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
| Pages | 297-315 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783642141249 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2011 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Choice-based conjoint analysis: Classification vs. discrete choice models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver