Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Choice-based conjoint analysis: Classification vs. discrete choice models

  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • Max Planck Institute for Informatics
  • Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Conjoint analysis is a family of techniques that originated in psychology and later became popular in market research. The main objective of conjoint analysis is to measure an individual's or a population's preferences on a class of options that can be described by parameters and their levels. We consider preference data obtained in choice-based conjoint analysis studies, where one observes test persons' choices on small subsets of the options. There are many ways to analyze choice-based conjoint analysis data. Here we discuss the intuition behind a classification based approach, and compare this approach to one based on statistical assumptions (discrete choice models) and to a regression approach. Our comparison on real and synthetic data indicates that the classification approach outperforms the discrete choice models.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPreference Learning
PublisherSpringer Berlin Heidelberg
Pages297-315
Number of pages19
ISBN (Print)9783642141249
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choice-based conjoint analysis: Classification vs. discrete choice models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this