TY - GEN
T1 - Cleaning Dirty Books
T2 - 2021 Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Findings of ACL: EMNLP 2021
AU - Kim, Allen
AU - Pethe, Charuta
AU - Inoue, Naoya
AU - Skiena, Steven
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Association for Computational Linguistics.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Substantial amounts of work are required to clean large collections of digitized books for NLP analysis, both because of the presence of errors in the scanned text and the presence of duplicate volumes in the corpora. In this paper, we consider the issue of deduplication in the presence of optical character recognition (OCR) errors. We present methods to handle these errors, evaluated on a collection of 19,347 texts from the Project Gutenberg dataset and 96,635 texts from the HathiTrust Library. We demonstrate that improvements in language models now enable the detection and correction of OCR errors without consideration of the scanning image itself. The inconsistencies found by aligning pairs of scans of the same underlying work provides training data to build models for detecting and correcting errors. We identify the canonical version for each of 17,136 repeatedly-scanned books from 58,808 scans. Finally, we investigate methods to detect and correct errors in single-copy texts. We show that on average, our method corrects over six times as many errors as it introduces. We also provide interesting analysis on the relation between scanning quality and other factors such as location and publication year.
AB - Substantial amounts of work are required to clean large collections of digitized books for NLP analysis, both because of the presence of errors in the scanned text and the presence of duplicate volumes in the corpora. In this paper, we consider the issue of deduplication in the presence of optical character recognition (OCR) errors. We present methods to handle these errors, evaluated on a collection of 19,347 texts from the Project Gutenberg dataset and 96,635 texts from the HathiTrust Library. We demonstrate that improvements in language models now enable the detection and correction of OCR errors without consideration of the scanning image itself. The inconsistencies found by aligning pairs of scans of the same underlying work provides training data to build models for detecting and correcting errors. We identify the canonical version for each of 17,136 repeatedly-scanned books from 58,808 scans. Finally, we investigate methods to detect and correct errors in single-copy texts. We show that on average, our method corrects over six times as many errors as it introduces. We also provide interesting analysis on the relation between scanning quality and other factors such as location and publication year.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85129129250
U2 - 10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.356
DO - 10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.356
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85129129250
T3 - Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Findings of ACL: EMNLP 2021
SP - 4217
EP - 4226
BT - Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Findings of ACL
A2 - Moens, Marie-Francine
A2 - Huang, Xuanjing
A2 - Specia, Lucia
A2 - Yih, Scott Wen-Tau
PB - Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
Y2 - 7 November 2021 through 11 November 2021
ER -