TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical genetic testing for patients with autism spectrum disorders
AU - Autism Consortium Clinical Genetics/DNA Diagnostics Collaboration
AU - Shen, Yiping
AU - Dies, Kira A.
AU - Holm, Ingrid A.
AU - Bridgemohan, Carolyn
AU - Sobeih, Magdi M.
AU - Caronna, Elizabeth B.
AU - Miller, Karen J.
AU - Frazier, Jean A.
AU - Silverstein, Iris
AU - Picker, Jonathan
AU - Weissman, Laura
AU - Raffalli, Peter
AU - Jeste, Shafali
AU - Demmer, Laurie A.
AU - Peters, Heather K.
AU - Brewster, Stephanie J.
AU - Kowalczyk, Sara J.J.
AU - Rosen-Sheidley, Beth
AU - McGowan, Caroline
AU - Duda, Andrew W.
AU - Lincoln, Sharyn A.
AU - Lowe, Kathryn R.
AU - Schonwald, Alison
AU - Robbins, Michael
AU - Hisama, Fuki
AU - Wolff, Robert
AU - Becker, Ronald
AU - Nasir, Ramzi
AU - Urion, David K.
AU - Milunsky, Jeff M.
AU - Rappaport, Leonard
AU - Gusella, James F.
AU - Walsh, Christopher A.
AU - Wu, Bai Lin
AU - Miller, David T.
AU - Albers, L.
AU - Alvarez, N.
AU - Ansel, D.
AU - Beaulieu, M. J.
AU - Berry, G.
AU - Ching, M.
AU - Corzo, D.
AU - Duffy, F. H.
AU - Friedman, S.
AU - Harris, D. J.
AU - Irons, M.
AU - Jost, A.
AU - Kang, P.
AU - Kothare, S.
AU - Choueiri, R.
PY - 2010/4/1
Y1 - 2010/4/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Multiple lines of evidence indicate a strong genetic contribution to autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Current guidelines for clinical genetic testing recommend a G-banded karyotype to detect chromosomal abnormalities and fragile X DNA testing, but guidelines for chromosomal microarray analysis have not been established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 933 patients received clinical genetic testing for a diagnosis of ASD between January 2006 and December 2008. Clinical genetic testing included G-banded karyotype, fragile X testing, and chromosomal microarray (CMA) to test for submicroscopic genomic deletions and duplications. Diagnostic yield of clinically significant genetic changes was compared. RESULTS: Karyotype yielded abnormal results in 19 of 852 patients (2.23% [95% confidence interval (Cl): 1.73%-2.73%]), fragile X testing was abnormal in 4 of 861 (0.46% [95% Cl: 0.36%-0.56%]), and CMA identified deletions or duplications in 154 of 848 patients (18.2% [95% Cl: 14.76%-21.64%]). CMA results for 59 of 848 patients (7.0% [95% Cl: 5.5%-8.5%]) were considered abnormal, which includes variants associated with known genomic disorders or variants of possible significance. CMA results were normal in 10 of 852 patients (1.2%) with abnormal karyotype due to balanced rearrangements or unidentified marker chromosome. CMA with whole-genome coverage and CMA with targeted genomic regions detected clinically relevant copy-number changes in 7.3% (51 of 697) and 5.3% (8 of 151) of patients, respectively, both higher than karyotype. With the exception of recurrent deletion and duplication of chromosome 16p11.2 and 15q13.2q13.3, most copynumber changes were unique or identified in only a small subset of patients. CONCLUSIONS: CMA had the highest detection rate among clinically available genetic tests for patients with ASD. Interpretation of microarray data is complicated by the presence of both novel and recurrent copy-number variants of unknown significance. Despite these limitations, CMA should be considered as part of the initial diagnostic evaluation of patients with ASD.
AB - BACKGROUND: Multiple lines of evidence indicate a strong genetic contribution to autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Current guidelines for clinical genetic testing recommend a G-banded karyotype to detect chromosomal abnormalities and fragile X DNA testing, but guidelines for chromosomal microarray analysis have not been established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 933 patients received clinical genetic testing for a diagnosis of ASD between January 2006 and December 2008. Clinical genetic testing included G-banded karyotype, fragile X testing, and chromosomal microarray (CMA) to test for submicroscopic genomic deletions and duplications. Diagnostic yield of clinically significant genetic changes was compared. RESULTS: Karyotype yielded abnormal results in 19 of 852 patients (2.23% [95% confidence interval (Cl): 1.73%-2.73%]), fragile X testing was abnormal in 4 of 861 (0.46% [95% Cl: 0.36%-0.56%]), and CMA identified deletions or duplications in 154 of 848 patients (18.2% [95% Cl: 14.76%-21.64%]). CMA results for 59 of 848 patients (7.0% [95% Cl: 5.5%-8.5%]) were considered abnormal, which includes variants associated with known genomic disorders or variants of possible significance. CMA results were normal in 10 of 852 patients (1.2%) with abnormal karyotype due to balanced rearrangements or unidentified marker chromosome. CMA with whole-genome coverage and CMA with targeted genomic regions detected clinically relevant copy-number changes in 7.3% (51 of 697) and 5.3% (8 of 151) of patients, respectively, both higher than karyotype. With the exception of recurrent deletion and duplication of chromosome 16p11.2 and 15q13.2q13.3, most copynumber changes were unique or identified in only a small subset of patients. CONCLUSIONS: CMA had the highest detection rate among clinically available genetic tests for patients with ASD. Interpretation of microarray data is complicated by the presence of both novel and recurrent copy-number variants of unknown significance. Despite these limitations, CMA should be considered as part of the initial diagnostic evaluation of patients with ASD.
KW - ACGH
KW - Array CGH
KW - ASD
KW - Autism spectrum disorder
KW - Language delay
KW - Microdeletion
KW - Microduplication
KW - Neuropsychiatric disorders
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77950564908
U2 - 10.1542/peds.2009-1684
DO - 10.1542/peds.2009-1684
M3 - Article
C2 - 20231187
AN - SCOPUS:77950564908
SN - 0031-4005
VL - 125
SP - e727-e735
JO - Pediatrics
JF - Pediatrics
IS - 4
ER -