Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical sensitivity of cystic fibrosis mutation panels in a diverse population

  • The New York State Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Consortium
  • Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research
  • SUNY Albany
  • Northwell Health System
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
  • Continuum Health Partners, Inc.
  • Albany Medical College
  • Westchester Medical Center
  • Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo
  • Good Samaritan Hospital
  • Columbia University
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • University of Rochester
  • Mount Sinai Beth
  • Steven and Alexandra Cohen Medical Center of New York
  • University Medical Center
  • Women and Children’s Hospital of Buffalo
  • Good Samaritan Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Infants are screened for cystic fibrosis (CF) in New York State (NYS) using an IRT-DNA algorithm. The purpose of this study was to validate and assess clinical validity of the US FDA-cleared Illumina MiSeqDx CF 139-Variant Assay (139-VA) in the diverse NYS CF population. The study included 439 infants with CF identified via newborn screening (NBS) from 2002 to 2012. All had been screened using the Abbott Molecular CF Genotyping Assay or the Hologic InPlex CF Molecular Test. All with CF and zero or one mutation were tested using the 139-VA. DNA extracted from dried blood spots was reliably and accurately genotyped using the 139-VA. Sixty-three additional mutations were identified. Clinical sensitivity of three panels ranged from 76.2% (23 mutations recommended for screening by ACMG/ACOG) to 79.7% (current NYS 39-mutation InPlex panel), up to 86.0% for the 139-VA. For all, sensitivity was highest in Whites and lowest in the Black population. Although the sample size was small, there was a nearly 20% increase in sensitivity for the Black CF population using the 139- VA (68.2%) over the ACMG/ACOG and InPlex panels (both 50.0%). Overall, the 139-VA is more sensitive than other commercially available panels, and could be considered for NBS, clinical, or research laboratories conducting CF screening.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-208
Number of pages8
JournalHuman Mutation
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2016

Keywords

  • CFTR
  • Clinical sensitivity
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Mutation panel
  • NGS
  • Newborn screening
  • Next-generation sequencing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical sensitivity of cystic fibrosis mutation panels in a diverse population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this