Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Collaborative memory and part-set cueing impairments: The role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption

  • University of Southern California

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Whenpeople are exposed to a subset of previously studied list items they recall fewer of the remaining items compared to a condition where none of the studied items is provided during recall. This occurs both when the subset of items is provided by the experimenter (i.e., the part-set cueing deficit in individual recall) and when they are provided during the course of a collaborative discussion (i.e., the collaborative inhibition effect in group recall). Previous research has identified retrieval disruption as a common mechanism underlying both effects; however, less is known about the factors that may make individuals susceptible to such retrieval disruption. In the current studies we tested one candidate factor: executive control. Using an executive depletion paradigm we directly manipulated an individual's level of executive control during retrieval. Results revealed no direct role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption. In contrast, executive control abilities were indirectly related to retrieval disruption through their influence at encoding. Together these results suggest that executive control des not directly affect retrieval disruption at the retrieval stage, and that the role of this putative mechanism may be limited to the encoding stage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)378-397
Number of pages20
JournalMemory
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Keywords

  • Collaborative inhibition
  • Executive depletion
  • Memory
  • Part-set cueing
  • Retrieval disruption

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collaborative memory and part-set cueing impairments: The role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this