Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Commentary on the River Stent Trial: Venous Sinus Stenting is Safe and Effective and can be Fully Evaluated Using Noninvasive Methods

  • Matthew Robert Amans
  • , Michael Levitt
  • , Joshua A. Hirsch
  • , J. Mocco
  • , David Fiorella
  • , David Altschul
  • , Dorothea Altschul
  • , Michael Chen
  • , Reade Andrew De Leacy
  • , Adam S. Arthur
  • , Kazim H. Narsinh
  • , Waleed Brinjikji
  • , James M. Milburn
  • , Michael G. Abraham
  • , Nicholas A. Telischak
  • , Ferdinand Hui
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • University of Washington
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Montefiore Einstein
  • Neurosurgeons of Nj
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Semmes Murphey Neurologic & Spine Institute
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Ochsner Medical System
  • University of Kansas
  • Stanford University
  • University of Hawai'i at Mānoa

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

5 Scopus citations
Original languageEnglish
Article numberjnis-2025-023433
JournalJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • Intervention
  • Intracranial Pressure
  • Stenosis
  • Stent
  • Vein

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary on the River Stent Trial: Venous Sinus Stenting is Safe and Effective and can be Fully Evaluated Using Noninvasive Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this