Abstract
In the past 30 years, energy researchers have concluded their academic publication with sections that deal directly with policy implications and recommendations. Yet too often, these recommendations are written with little understanding of how policymakers balance different needs, prefer to communicate, or use scientific information. In thismanuscript, we outline key variables-time, training, and interpretation-that are key to understanding how to better communicate research implications to policymakers. We recommend emphasizing the power of language and the use of boundary objects in an attempt to mitigate the issues presented between researchers and policymakers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 449 |
| Journal | Sustainability (Switzerland) |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 9 2018 |
Keywords
- Communication theory
- Deficit model
- Energy policy
- Science communication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Communication barriers and lessons learned in energy policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver