Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing Markov and non-Markov alternatives for cost-effectiveness analysis: Insights from a cervical cancer case

  • Cristina del Campo
  • , Jiaru Bai
  • , L. Robin Keller
  • Complutense University
  • University of California at Irvine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Markov model allows medical prognosis to be modeled with health state transitions over time and are particularly useful for decisions regarding diseases where uncertain events and outcomes may occur. To provide sufficient detail for operations researchers to carry out a Markov analysis, we present a detailed example of a Markov model with five health states with monthly transitions with stationary transition probabilities between states to model the cost and effectiveness of two treatments for advanced cervical cancer. A different approach uses survival curves to directly model the fraction of patients in each state at each time period without the Markov property. We use this alternative method to analyze the cervical cancer case and compare the Markov and non-Markov approaches. These models provide useful insights about both the effectiveness of treatments and the associated costs for healthcare decision makers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-43
Number of pages12
JournalOperations Research for Health Care
Volume21
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Markov process
  • Stationary probabilities
  • Survival analysis
  • Time-dependent probabilities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Markov and non-Markov alternatives for cost-effectiveness analysis: Insights from a cervical cancer case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this