Abstract
The factors influencing the insertion of non-etymological material (epenthesis) may extend beyond phonetics and phonology to include morphological and morphosyntactic considerations. We analyse cases from a wide variety of Romance languages where more than one epenthetic segment may satisfy a phonological constraint. We show that the choice of segment may be influenced by morphology or morphosyntax. We also investigate the insertion of a meaningless syllable where there may be little or no phonological motivation for insertion, but morphology plays a role in its distribution. In all of the cases examined, the inserted material (segment or syllable) has no semantic value and so is not a morph. Many of these phenomena have been accounted for in terms of lexically listed allomorphs; however, such an approach misses generalizations about the form and presence of the epenthetic material. We conclude that the notion of epenthesis should be broadened to include morphological and morphosyntactic conditions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Periphrasis and Inflexion in Diachrony |
| Subtitle of host publication | A View from Romance |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 362-380 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780198870807 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2022 |
Keywords
- allomorphy
- epenthesis
- morphology
- morphosyntax
- phonetics
- phonology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conditioned epenthesis in Romance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver