Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Confirmatory Analysis of Opinions Regarding the Pros and Cons of Mammography

  • William Rakowski
  • , Anne M. Stoddard
  • , Barbara K. Rimer
  • , Sarah A. Fox
  • , M. Robyn Andersen
  • , Nicole Urban
  • , Dorothy S. Lane
  • , Mary E. Costanza
  • Brown University
  • University of Massachusetts
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • RAND Corporation
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

119 Scopus citations

Abstract

This investigation extends prior research to apply decision-making constructs from the transtheoretical model (TTM) of behavior change to mammography screening. Study subjects were 8,914 women ages 50-80, recruited from 40 primarily rural communities in Washington State. Structural equation modeling showed that favorable and unfavorable opinions about mammography (i.e., pros and cons) fit the observed data. Analysis of variance supported the associations between readiness to obtain screening (i.e., stage of adoption) and opinions about mammography (i.e., decisional balance) previously found in research using smaller samples from another geographic region. This report extends these earlier studies by using structural equation modeling, opinion scales based both on principal component analyses and on a priori definitions, a developmental sample and a confirmatory sample, and by sampling from a different geographic region. It is recommended that future research examine whether opinions regarding the cons of mammography are more individually specific than the pros.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)433-441
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1997

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Mammography
  • Stages of adoption
  • Transtheoretical model
  • Women's health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Confirmatory Analysis of Opinions Regarding the Pros and Cons of Mammography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this