TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus Guideline for the Management of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases
AU - Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM) Consortium Group
AU - Schultz, Kurt S.
AU - Bansal, Varun V.
AU - Wach, Michael M.
AU - Bhutiani, Neal
AU - Godley, Frederick A.
AU - Wang, Jaeyun Jaeyun Jane
AU - Waheed, Muhammad Talha
AU - Buchheit, Joanna T.
AU - Papai, Emily
AU - Campbell, Susan
AU - Schleimer, Lauren E.
AU - Su, David G.
AU - Turaga, Kiran K.
AU - Gunderson, Craig G.
AU - White, Michael G.
AU - Uppal, Abhineet
AU - Raghav, Kanwal P.S.
AU - Labow, Daniel M.
AU - Sarpel, Umut
AU - Shergill, Ardaman P.
AU - Shen, John Paul
AU - Eng, Cathy
AU - Foote, Michael B.
AU - Baumgartner, Joel M.
AU - Li, Yan
AU - Gao, Xiang
AU - Keutgen, Xavier
AU - Morano, William
AU - Bowne, Wilbur B.
AU - Luo, Wenyi
AU - Foo, Wai Chin
AU - Vudatha, Vignesh
AU - Gushchin, Vadim
AU - Khan, Uqba
AU - Maduekwe, Ugwuji
AU - Grotz, Travis
AU - Nguyen, Trang
AU - Halfdanarson, Thorvardur
AU - Lwin, Thinzar
AU - Jaraczewski, Taylor
AU - Gamblin, T. Clark
AU - Libutti, Steven
AU - Ahrendt, Steven
AU - Greco, Stephanie
AU - Stein, Stacey
AU - Cohen, Stacey
AU - Abdel-Misih, Sherif
AU - Radomski, Shannon
AU - Concors, Seth
AU - Georgakis, Georgios
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Cancer Society 2025.
PY - 2026/6
Y1 - 2026/6
N2 - Background: The peritoneum is a common site of metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC), yet controversy exists regarding optimal treatment strategies. These guidelines describe the results of a national consensus addressing the management of CRC with peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM). Methods: An update of the 2018 Chicago Consensus Guidelines was conducted using a modified Delphi technique. Two rounds of voting were performed to assess agreement levels on two clinical management pathways regarding synchronous and metachronous CRC-PM. Supporting evidence was evaluated via rapid literature reviews. Results: The overall level of evidence was low in existing literature. Of 145 participants in the first round, 136 (96.8%) responded in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved in most pathway blocks. For both pathways, early referral to a peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) center should be made for patients with CRC-PM. For the synchronous pathway, upfront cytoreductive surgery was de-emphasized in favor of systemic therapy. For the metachronous pathway, risk stratification via clinical and pathologic features was revised. For both pathways, surveillance strategies were added, including only a weak recommendation for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing given limited evidence of its utility in detecting and monitoring PM. Conclusion: The consensus-driven clinical pathways provide valuable guidance for the management of CRC-PM. There remains a need for high-quality evidence and prospective multicenter trials in this domain.
AB - Background: The peritoneum is a common site of metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC), yet controversy exists regarding optimal treatment strategies. These guidelines describe the results of a national consensus addressing the management of CRC with peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM). Methods: An update of the 2018 Chicago Consensus Guidelines was conducted using a modified Delphi technique. Two rounds of voting were performed to assess agreement levels on two clinical management pathways regarding synchronous and metachronous CRC-PM. Supporting evidence was evaluated via rapid literature reviews. Results: The overall level of evidence was low in existing literature. Of 145 participants in the first round, 136 (96.8%) responded in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved in most pathway blocks. For both pathways, early referral to a peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) center should be made for patients with CRC-PM. For the synchronous pathway, upfront cytoreductive surgery was de-emphasized in favor of systemic therapy. For the metachronous pathway, risk stratification via clinical and pathologic features was revised. For both pathways, surveillance strategies were added, including only a weak recommendation for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing given limited evidence of its utility in detecting and monitoring PM. Conclusion: The consensus-driven clinical pathways provide valuable guidance for the management of CRC-PM. There remains a need for high-quality evidence and prospective multicenter trials in this domain.
KW - Colon cancer
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Cytoreductive surgery
KW - Guidelines
KW - Intraperitoneal chemotherapy
KW - Peritoneal surface malignancies
KW - Peritoneal surface neoplasms
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - ctDNA
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013541841
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-025-17363-0
DO - 10.1245/s10434-025-17363-0
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40560497
AN - SCOPUS:105013541841
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 33
SP - 5260
EP - 5282
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 6
ER -