TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus guideline for the management of patients with appendiceal tumors, part 1
T2 - Appendiceal tumors without peritoneal involvement
AU - Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Consortium Group
AU - Godfrey, Elizabeth L.
AU - Mahoney, Forest
AU - Bansal, Varun V.
AU - Su, David G.
AU - Hanna, David N.
AU - Lopez-Ramirez, Felipe
AU - Baron, Ekaterina
AU - Turaga, Kiran K.
AU - Benson, Al B.
AU - Cusack, James
AU - Winer, Joshua H.
AU - Gunderson, Craig G.
AU - Misdraji, Joseph
AU - Shah, Rupen
AU - Magge, Deepa R.
AU - Solsky, Ian
AU - Eng, Cathy
AU - Eng, Oliver S.
AU - Shergill, Ardaman
AU - Shen, John Paul
AU - Foote, Michael B.
AU - Hamed, Ahmed
AU - Khader, Adam
AU - Venook, Alan
AU - Tam, Alda
AU - Fisher, Alex V.
AU - Kim, Alex
AU - Loftus, Alexander
AU - Thomas, Alexander
AU - Gangi, Alexandra
AU - Greene, Alicia
AU - Greenbaum, Alissa
AU - Arrington, Amanda
AU - Abu Alfa, Amer K.
AU - Gleisner, Ana
AU - Kothari, Anai
AU - Govindarajan, Anand
AU - Holowatyj, Andreana N.
AU - Nikiforchin, Andrei
AU - Abreu, Andres
AU - Blakely, Andrew
AU - Łowy, Andrew
AU - Bellizzi, Andrew M.
AU - Dhiman, Ankit
AU - Villano, Anthony
AU - Bouchard-Fortier, Antoine
AU - Saeed, Anwaar
AU - Sardi, Armando
AU - Bakkila, Baylee
AU - Georgakis, Georgios
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Cancer Society.
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - Background: Appendiceal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors that may be localized or disseminated throughout the peritoneum. Limited high-quality clinical data exist, and many practices have been extrapolated from colorectal cancer without validation in appendiceal cohorts. There are many controversies regarding the treatment of appendiceal tumors, and practices vary widely between centers and care settings. A national consensus update of best management practices for appendiceal malignancies was performed to better standardize care. Methods: The 2018 Chicago Consensus guideline was updated through a modified Delphi consensus performed over two rounds using nationally circulated surveys. Supporting evidence was evaluated using rapid systematic reviews. Key systemic therapy concepts were summarized by content experts. Results: Most supporting literature consists of observational studies, but high-quality studies increasingly are becoming available to drive management. Two consensus-based pathways were generated for localized appendiceal tumors: one for epithelial mucinous neoplasms and another for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Of 138 participants responding in the first round, 133 (96%) engaged in the second round. Greater than 90% consensus was achieved for all pathway blocks. Key points include minimizing intervention invasiveness when permitted by pathologic classification and margin status and determining which margin and pathologic findings are indications for consideration of cytoreduction with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Surveillance and systemic therapy recommendations are also presented. Conclusions: With growing but still primarily observational evidence currently dictating care, these consensus recommendations provide expert guidance in the treatment of appendiceal tumors without peritoneal involvement.
AB - Background: Appendiceal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors that may be localized or disseminated throughout the peritoneum. Limited high-quality clinical data exist, and many practices have been extrapolated from colorectal cancer without validation in appendiceal cohorts. There are many controversies regarding the treatment of appendiceal tumors, and practices vary widely between centers and care settings. A national consensus update of best management practices for appendiceal malignancies was performed to better standardize care. Methods: The 2018 Chicago Consensus guideline was updated through a modified Delphi consensus performed over two rounds using nationally circulated surveys. Supporting evidence was evaluated using rapid systematic reviews. Key systemic therapy concepts were summarized by content experts. Results: Most supporting literature consists of observational studies, but high-quality studies increasingly are becoming available to drive management. Two consensus-based pathways were generated for localized appendiceal tumors: one for epithelial mucinous neoplasms and another for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Of 138 participants responding in the first round, 133 (96%) engaged in the second round. Greater than 90% consensus was achieved for all pathway blocks. Key points include minimizing intervention invasiveness when permitted by pathologic classification and margin status and determining which margin and pathologic findings are indications for consideration of cytoreduction with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Surveillance and systemic therapy recommendations are also presented. Conclusions: With growing but still primarily observational evidence currently dictating care, these consensus recommendations provide expert guidance in the treatment of appendiceal tumors without peritoneal involvement.
KW - appendiceal malignancies
KW - cytoreductive surgical procedures, guidelines
KW - peritoneal neoplasms
KW - peritoneal surface malignancies
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009763866
U2 - 10.1002/cncr.35867
DO - 10.1002/cncr.35867
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 40560498
AN - SCOPUS:105009763866
SN - 0008-543X
VL - 131
JO - Cancer
JF - Cancer
IS - 13
M1 - e35867
ER -