Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Current perspectives on occupational cancer risks

  • Paolo Boffetta
  • , Manolis Kogevinas
  • , Lorenzo Simonato
  • , Julian Wilbourn
  • , Rodolfo Saracci
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer
  • Municipal Institute for Medical Research Hospital del Mar
  • Venetian Cancer Registry
  • National Research Council of Italy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

On the basis of the International Agency for Research on Cancer's evaluations of occupational exposure, 22 occupational agents are classified as human carcinogens and an additional 22 agents as probable human carcinogen. In addition, evidence of increased risk of cancer was associated with particular industries and occupational, although no specific agents could be identified as etiologic factors. The main problem in the construction and interpretation of such lists is the lack of detailed qualitative and quantitative knowledge about exposures to know or suspected carcinogen. The recent examples of recognized occupational carcinogen, such as cadmium, beryllium, and ethylene oxide, stress the importance of the refinement in the methods for exposure assessment and for statistical analysis on the one hand and the potential benefits from the application of bio markess of exposure and early effect on the other hand. Other trends that may be identified include the increasing practice of multicentric studies and investigations of exposures relevant to white collar workers and women. Finally, there is a need for investigation of occupational cancer risks in developing countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-325
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
Volume1
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Keywords

  • Cancer risks
  • Chemicals
  • Drugs
  • Occupational exposures
  • Pesticides

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current perspectives on occupational cancer risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this