Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

  • (Dark Energy Survey Collaboration)
  • National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  • Rhodes University
  • University College London
  • Institute of Space Studies of Catalonia
  • Institute for High Energy Physics
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  • Stanford University
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • University of Queensland
  • ARC Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics
  • University of Portsmouth
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • University of Surrey
  • University of Cambridge
  • University of North Dakota
  • Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
  • Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris
  • The University of Chicago
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Manchester
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
  • Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia
  • Observatório Nacional
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • University of Southampton
  • University of Nottingham
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1016 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg2 of griz imaging data from the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric-redshift estimation and validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias, the bulk of the analysis was carried out while "blind" to the true results; we describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat ΛCDM and wCDM cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for ΛCDM) or 7 (for wCDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino mass density and including the 457×457 element analytic covariance matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point functions and from their combination obtain S8≡σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.773-0.020+0.026 and Ωm=0.267-0.017+0.030 for ΛCDM; for wCDM, we find S8=0.782-0.024+0.036, Ωm=0.284-0.030+0.033, and w=-0.82-0.20+0.21 at 68% C.L. The precision of these DES Y1 constraints rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms. Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for S8 and Ωm are lower than the central values from Planck for both ΛCDM and wCDM, the Bayes factor indicates that the DES Y1 and Planck data sets are consistent with each other in the context of ΛCDM. Combining DES Y1 with Planck, baryonic acoustic oscillation measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS and type Ia supernovae from the Joint Lightcurve Analysis data set, we derive very tight constraints on cosmological parameters: S8=0.802±0.012 and Ωm=0.298±0.007 in ΛCDM and w=-1.00-0.04+0.05 in wCDM. Upcoming Dark Energy Survey analyses will provide more stringent tests of the ΛCDM model and extensions such as a time-varying equation of state of dark energy or modified gravity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number043526
JournalPhysical Review D
Volume98
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this