TY - CHAP
T1 - Dasan Jeong Yak-yong
T2 - A Synthesizer of Korean Confucianism
AU - Kim, Hongkyung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Despite the dominant practice in contemporary Korean academia since 1936 to define Dasan’s philosophy and Practical Learning (Silhak: 實學) as intellectual defiance against neo-Confucianism and neo-Confucian society, some scholarly efforts that have sought to disprove this understanding attract the unremitting attention of many modern skeptics. These efforts revolve around one point: they are not separated from neo-Confucianism philosophically, politically, and historically. In this view, these “new” intellectual trends are perceived as redemption of the ideal Confucian statecraft commonly cherished by all types of Confucians, and a natural development consequent on the expansion of neo-Confucian interest in Confucian classical texts. In stark contrast to the prevailing perspective on Dasan’s philosophy and Practical Learning, which sees them as estranged from their neo-Confucian predecessors probably with hope of positioning them closer to modernity, the opposition insists continuity exists between the two Confucian traditions, somewhat provoking disconnection of all Joseon intelligentsia from modernity.
AB - Despite the dominant practice in contemporary Korean academia since 1936 to define Dasan’s philosophy and Practical Learning (Silhak: 實學) as intellectual defiance against neo-Confucianism and neo-Confucian society, some scholarly efforts that have sought to disprove this understanding attract the unremitting attention of many modern skeptics. These efforts revolve around one point: they are not separated from neo-Confucianism philosophically, politically, and historically. In this view, these “new” intellectual trends are perceived as redemption of the ideal Confucian statecraft commonly cherished by all types of Confucians, and a natural development consequent on the expansion of neo-Confucian interest in Confucian classical texts. In stark contrast to the prevailing perspective on Dasan’s philosophy and Practical Learning, which sees them as estranged from their neo-Confucian predecessors probably with hope of positioning them closer to modernity, the opposition insists continuity exists between the two Confucian traditions, somewhat provoking disconnection of all Joseon intelligentsia from modernity.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85103711045
U2 - 10.1007/978-90-481-2933-1_16
DO - 10.1007/978-90-481-2933-1_16
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85103711045
T3 - Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy
SP - 363
EP - 379
BT - Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy
PB - Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
ER -