Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Default and punishment in general equilibrium

  • Yale University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

184 Scopus citations

Abstract

We extend the standard model of general equilibrium with incomplete markets to allow for default and punishment by thinking of assets as pools. The equilibrating variables include expected delivery rates, along with the usual prices of assets and commodities. By reinterpreting the variables, our model encompasses a broad range of adverse selection and signalling phenomena in a perfectly competitive, general equilibrium framework. Perfect competition eliminates the need for lenders to compute how the size of their loan or the price they quote might affect default rates. It also makes for a simple equilibrium refinement, which we propose in order to rule out irrational pessimism about deliveries of untraded assets. We show that refined equilibrium always exists in our model, and that default, in conjunction with refinement, opens the door to a theory of endogenous assets. The market chooses the promises, default penalties, and quantity constraints of actively traded assets.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-37
Number of pages37
JournalEconometrica
Volume73
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005

Keywords

  • Adverse selection
  • Default
  • Endogenous assets
  • Equilibrium refinement
  • Incomplete markets
  • Moral hazard

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Default and punishment in general equilibrium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this