Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Determination of Volume of Distribution using Likelihood Estimation in Graphical Analysis: Elimination of Estimation Bias

  • Columbia University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

The graphical analysis uses an ordinary least squares (OLS) fitting of transformed data to determine the total volume of distribution (VT) and is not dependent upon a compartmental model configuration. This method, however, suffers from a noise-dependent bias. Approaches for reducing this bias include incorporating a presmoothing step, minimizing the squared perpendicular distance to the regression line, and conducting multilinear analysis. The solution proposed by Ogden, likelihood estimation in graphical analysis (LEGA), is an estimation technique in the original (nontransformed) domain based upon standard likelihood theory that incorporates the specific assumptions made on the noise inherent in the measurements. To determine the impact of this new method upon the noise-dependent bias, we compared VT determinations by compartmental modeling, graphical analysis (GA), and LEGA in 36 regions of interest in dynamic PET data from 25 healthy volunteers injected with [ 11C]-WAY-100635 and [11C]-McN-5652, which are agents used to image the serotonin IA receptor and serotonin transporter, respectively. As predicted by simulations, LEGA eliminates the noise-dependent bias associated with GA using OLS. This method is a valuable addition to the tools available for the quantification of radioligand binding data in PET and SPECT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1471-1478
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Volume23
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Keywords

  • Compartment
  • Kinetic
  • Logan
  • Modeling
  • Serotonin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determination of Volume of Distribution using Likelihood Estimation in Graphical Analysis: Elimination of Estimation Bias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this