Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dietary adherence in the women's health initiative dietary modification trial

  • Women’s Health Initiative Study Group
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Stony Brook University
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • University of Massachusetts Boston
  • University of Miami
  • University of Florida
  • Emory University
  • University of Iowa
  • Northwestern University
  • Wake Forest University
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Brown University
  • George Washington University
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Howard University
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Stanford University
  • University of Arizona
  • University of California at Davis
  • University of California at San Diego
  • University of Cincinnati
  • University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • University of Nevada, Reno
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article describes adherence to a low-fat dietary pattern (less than 20% energy from fat, five or more fruit/vegetable and six or more grain servings daily) in Years 1 and 5 of the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial, which was designed to examine the effects of a low-fat dietary pattern on risk of breast and colorectal cancers and other chronic diseases in postmenopausal women. Participants were randomly assigned to a low-fat dietary intervention arm (40%, n=19,542) or a usual diet control arm (60%, n=29,294). Women in the intervention arm completed 18 group sessions during the first year, followed by quarterly annual maintenance sessions. Adherence was assessed as control minus intervention (C-I) group differences in percent total energy from fat as estimated by a food frequency questionnaire. Based on these self-reported dietary data, mean C-I was 10.9 percentage points of energy from fat at Year 1, decreasing to 9.0 at Year 5. Factors associated with poorer adherence were being older, being African American or Hispanic (compared with white), having low income, and being obese. Group session attendance was strongly associated with better dietary adherence. There are many limitations of self-reported dietary data, particularly related to social desirability and intervention-associated bias. Nonetheless, these data indicate that long-term dietary change was achieved in this clinical trial setting and reinforce the potential of the ongoing trial to answer questions of public health importance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)654-658
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American Dietetic Association
Volume104
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dietary adherence in the women's health initiative dietary modification trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this