Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dietary Intake of Animal and Plant Proteins and Risk of Gastrointestinal Cancer Mortality: Results from the Golestan Cohort Study

  • Farideh Shiraseb
  • , Abbasali Keshtkar
  • , Hossein Poustchi
  • , Akram Pourshams
  • , Arash Etemadi
  • , Farin Kamangar
  • , Paolo Boffetta
  • , Christian C. Abnet
  • , Khadijeh Mirzaei
  • , Reza Malekzadeh
  • , Maryam Hashemian
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Morgan State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers account for a significant global cancer burden, but the link between intake of proteins from different sources and GI cancer mortality is unclear. Objectives: This study examined associations between the percentage of energy received from animal protein intake (API) and plant protein intake (PPI), and mortality from esophageal (EC), gastric (GC), colorectal (CRC), and pancreatic (PC) cancers in 42,323 participants of the Golestan Cohort Study (GCS). Methods: Using data from a baseline food frequency questionnaire, hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated through Cox models, including isocaloric substitution analyses of API and PPI. Results: During 13.4 y of follow-up, 676 deaths from GI cancer occurred. We found no association between API and GI cancer mortality [HRQ5 vs Q1 = 1.023; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.626, 1.673; P for trend = 0.976], and a positive association between PPI and overall GI cancer mortality (HRQ5 vs Q1 = 2.635; 95% CI: 1.368, 5.074; P for trend = 0.005). We identified no association between API and EC mortality (HRQ5 vs Q1 = 0.711; 95% CI: 0.377, 1.746; P for trend = 0.058), and a positive association between PPI and EC mortality (HRQ5 vs Q1 = 5.226; 95% CI: 1.888, 14.459; P for trend = 0.001). BMI and wealth score modified some of these associations. There was no association between API or PPI and GC, CRC, or PC mortality. We observed a decreasing trend in percentage of energy received from fish protein (HRQ5 vs Q1 = 0.766; 95% CI: 0.585, 1.004; P for trend = 0.038) and legume protein (HRQ5 vs Q1 = 0.760; 95% CI: 0.588, 0.982; P for trend = 0.042) related to GI cancer mortality. In contrast, refined grains protein showed an increasing trend (HRQ5 vs Q1 = 1.472; 95% CI: 1.023, 2.117; P for trend = 0.027). Conclusions: In the GCS, with refined grains as the main source of PPI, we observed a positive association between PPI and GI cancer and EC mortality. Future studies should focus on food groups simultaneously.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3479-3495
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Nutrition
Volume155
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2025

Keywords

  • animal protein
  • gastrointestinal cancer
  • isocaloric substitution
  • plant protein

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dietary Intake of Animal and Plant Proteins and Risk of Gastrointestinal Cancer Mortality: Results from the Golestan Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this