Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does Sleeve Shape Make a Difference in Outcomes?

  • Adel Alhaj Saleh
  • , Michal R. Janik
  • , Rami R. Mustafa
  • , Mohammed Alshehri
  • , Adil H. Khan
  • , Seyed Mohammad Kalantar Motamedi
  • , Shiraz Rahim
  • , Indravadan Patel
  • , Amir Aryaie
  • , Mujjahid Abbas
  • , Tomasz Rogula
  • , Leena Khaitan
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most common procedures performed for weight loss. Many seek the “perfect sleeve” with the notion that the type of calibrating device affects sleeve shape, and this in turn will affect outcomes and complications. Two major concerns after SG are amount of weight loss and acid reflux. Our aim was to determine if the various calibration methods could impact sleeve shape and thereby allow for better outcomes of weight loss and reflux. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of 210 patients who underwent SG and had postoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) study from 2011 to 2015 in a single center by a single (fellowship-trained) bariatric surgeon. Data regarding demographics, calibrating devices and clinical outcomes at 1 year (weight loss and de novo acid reflux) were collected. UGIs were reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the clinical outcomes. Sleeve shape was classified according to a previously described classification as tubular, dumbbell, upper pouch, or lower pouch. The types of calibrating devices used to guide the sleeve size intraoperatively were endoscopy, large-bore orogastric tube, and fenestrated suction tube. Results: One hundred ninety-nine patients met inclusion criteria (11 had no esophagram). Demographics revealed age 45.76 ± 10.6 years, BMI 47 ± 8.6 kg/m2, and 82% female. Calibration devices used were endoscopic guidance (7.6%), large bore orogastric tube (41.4%), and fenestrated suction tube (50.5%). Sleeve shape was reported as 32.6% tubular, 20.6% dumbbell, 39.2% lower pouch, and 7.5% upper pouch (100% interrater reliability). No correlation was seen with type of calibration used. Of patients, 62.0% had > 50% excess weight loss at 1 year. Twenty-three percent of patients remained on PPI at 1 year (of which 43.3% did not have reflux preoperatively). The lower pouch shape showed a trend toward less reflux and more weight loss. Conclusion: This study showed no clear association between uniformity of sleeve shape and the type of calibration device used. The study showed a trend toward decreased reflux and improved weight loss with the lower pouch shape, regardless of calibration device.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1731-1737
Number of pages7
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Keywords

  • Reflux
  • Shape
  • Sleeve gastrectomy
  • Weight loss

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Sleeve Shape Make a Difference in Outcomes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this