Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.

  • Eric J. Rashba
  • , Morteza Farasat
  • , Malcolm M. Kirk
  • , Stephen R. Shorofsky
  • , Robert W. Peters
  • , Michael R. Gold
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have older lead systems, which are usually not replaced at the time of pulse generator replacement unless a malfunction is noted. Therefore, optimization of defibrillation with these lead systems is clinically important. The objective of this prospective study was to determine if an active abdominal pulse generator (Can) affects chronic defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 39 patients who presented for routine abdominal pulse generator replacement. Each patient underwent two assessments of DFT using a step-down protocol, with the order of testing randomized. The distal right ventricular (RV) coil was the anode for the first phase of the biphasic shocks. The proximal superior vena cava (SVC) coil was the cathode for the Lead Alone configuration (RV --> SVC). For the Active Can configuration, the SVC coil and Can were connected electrically as the cathode (RV --> SVC + Can). The Active Can configuration was associated with a significant decrease in shock impedance (39.5 +/- 5.8 Omega vs. 50.0 +/- 7.6 Omega, P < 0.01) and a significant increase in peak current (8.3 +/- 2.6 A vs. 7.2 +/- 2.4 A, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in DFT energy (9.0 +/- 4.6 J vs. 9.8 +/- 5.2 J) or leading edge voltage (319 +/- 86 V vs. 315 +/- 83 V). An adequate safety margin for defibrillation (> or =10 J) was present in all patients with both shocking configurations. CONCLUSION: DFTs are similar with the Active Can and Lead Alone configurations when a dual-coil, transvenous lead is used with a left abdominal pulse generator. Since most commercially available ICDs are only available with an active can, our data support the use of an active can device with this lead system for patients who present for routine pulse generator replacement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)617-620
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this