Efficacy and safety outcomes of a compounded testosterone pellet versus a branded testosterone pellet in men with testosterone deficiency: a single-center, open-label, randomized trial

Background: Testosterone deficiency (TD) is a prevalent condition, especially in men ≥45 years old, and testosterone therapy (TTh) can improve the quality of life in these patients. Aim: To evaluate the safety profile of compounded subcutaneous testosterone pellets and to compare the efficacy between compounded and market brand testosterone pellets for TTh: E100 (Empower Pharmacy) and Testopel (Food and Drug Administration approved), respectively. Methods: This was a prospective, phase 3, randomized, noninferiority clinical trial. We enrolled 75 men diagnosed with TD and randomized them 1:1 to a market brand group and a compounded pellet group. The patients were implanted with their respective testosterone pellets: Testopel (10 pellets of 75 mg) and E100 (8 pellets of 100 mg). Outcomes: We evaluated adverse events after implantation and followed men at 2, 4, and 6 months for morning laboratory levels (prior to 10 AM): serum testosterone, estradiol, hematocrit, and prostate-specific antigen. Results: After randomization, 33 participants were enrolled in the Testopel arm and 42 in the E100 arm. Serum testosterone levels were similar between the groups at 2, 4, and 6 months, with most men (82%) dropping to <300 ng/dL by the end of the trial. Adverse events were also similar, such as elevations in prostate-specific antigen, estradiol, and hematocrit. Most dropouts were related to persistent TD symptoms and serum testosterone <300 ng/dL, with similar rates between the groups in the study. Clinical Implications: Men treated with Testopel and E100 pellets had comparable serum testosterone levels and similar adverse event rates, providing an effective choice of long-term TTh among men with TD. Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include the prospective, randomized, single-blinded study design and adequate follow-up. Limitations include the lack of external validity and the single-institution cohort. Conclusion: E100 compounded testosterone pellets are a noninferior option of TTh as compared with Testopel for men presenting with TD.