Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficient and robust optimal design for quantile regression based on linear programming

  • Stony Brook University
  • Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

When informing decisions with experimental data, it is often necessary to quantify the distribution tails of uncertain system responses using limited data. To maximize the information content of the data, one is naturally led to use experimental design. However, common design techniques minimize global statistics such as the average estimation or prediction variance. Novel methods for optimal experimental design that target distribution tails are developed. To achieve this, pre-asymptotic estimates of the data uncertainty are produced via an upper bound on a prescribed quantile, computed using quantile regression. Two optimal design problems are formulated: (i) Minimize the variance of the upper bound; and (ii) Minimize the Conditional Value-at-Risk of the upper bound. Additionally, each design problem is augmented with an added cardinality constraint to bound the number of experiments. These optimal design problems are reduced to continuous and mixed-integer linear programming problems. Consequently, the proposed methods are extremely efficient, even when applied to large datasets. The application of the proposed design formulation is demonstrated through a sensor placement problem in direct field acoustic testing.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107892
JournalComputational Statistics and Data Analysis
Volume192
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR)
  • Direct Field Acoustic Testing (DFAT)
  • Linear programming
  • Optimal design of experiments
  • Quantile regression
  • Robust design of experiments

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficient and robust optimal design for quantile regression based on linear programming'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this