Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficient sparse LU factorization with partial pivoting on distributed memory architectures

  • Siemens Pyramid Information Systems
  • IEEE
  • University of California at Santa Barbara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

A sparse LU factorization based on Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting (GEPP) is important to many scientific applications, but it is still an open problem to develop a high performance GEPP code on distributed memory machines. The main difficulty is that partial pivoting operations dynamically change computation and nonzero fill-in structures during the elimination process. This paper presents an approach called S* for parallelizing this problem on distributed memory machines. The S* approach adopts static symbolic factorization to avoid run-time control overhead, incorporates 2D L/U supernode partitioning and amalgamation strategies to improve caching performance, and exploits irregular task parallelism embedded in sparse LU using asynchronous computation scheduling. The paper discusses and compares the algorithms using 1D and 2D data mapping schemes, and presents experimental studies on Cray-T3D and T3E. The performance results for a set of nonsymmetric benchmark matrices are very encouraging, and S* has achieved up to 6.878 GFLOPS on 128 T3E nodes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest performance ever achieved for this challenging problem and the previous record was 2.583 GFLOPS on shared memory machines [8].

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-125
Number of pages17
JournalIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Keywords

  • Asynchronous computation scheduling
  • Dense structures
  • Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting
  • Irregular parallelism
  • Sparse LU factorization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficient sparse LU factorization with partial pivoting on distributed memory architectures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this