Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

El Apego Va a Juicio: Problemas de Custodia y Protección Infantil

Translated title of the contribution: Attachment goes to court: Child protection and custody issues
  • Tommie Forslund
  • , Pehr Granqvist
  • , Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
  • , Avi Sagi-Schwartz
  • , Danya Glaser
  • , Miriam Steele
  • , Mårten Hammarlund
  • , Carlo Schuengel
  • , Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg
  • , Howard Steele
  • , Phillip R. Shaver
  • , Ulrike Lux
  • , John Simmonds
  • , Deborah Jacobvitz
  • , Ashley M. Groh
  • , Kristin Bernard
  • , Chantal Cyr
  • , Nancy L. Hazen
  • , Sarah Foster
  • , Elia Psouni
  • Philip A. Cowan, Carolyn Pape Cowan, Anne Rifkin-Graboi, David Wilkins, Blaise Pierrehumbert, George M. Tarabulsy, Rodrigo A. Cárcamo, Zhengyan Wang, Xi Liang, Maria Kázmierczak, Paulina Pawlicka, Lilian Ayiro, Tamara Chansa, Francis Sichimba, Haatembo Mooya, Loyola McLean, Manuela Verissimo, Sonia Gojman-De-Millán, Marlene M. Moretti, Fabien Bacro, Mikko J. Peltola, Megan Galbally, Kiyomi Kondo-Ikemura, Kazuko Y. Behrens, Stephen Scott, Andrés Fresno Rodriguez, Rosario Spencer, Germán Posada, Rosalinda Cassibba, Neus Barrantes-Vidal, Jesús Palacios, Lavinia Barone, Sheri Madigan, Karen Mason-Jones, Sophie Reijman, Femmie Juffer, R. Pasco Fearon, Annie Bernier, Dante Cicchetti, Glenn I. Roisman, Jude Cassidy, Heinz Kindler, Peter Zimmerman, Ruth Feldman, Gottfried Spangle, Charles H. Zeanah, Mary Dozier, Jay Belsky, Michael E. Lamb, Robbie Duschinsky
  • Stockholm University
  • SUF Resource Center
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • University of Haifa
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
  • University College London
  • The New School
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • University of California at Davis
  • German Youth Institute
  • British Association for Adoption and Fostering at Coram (CoramBAAF)
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • University of Missouri
  • Université du Québec à Montréal
  • Northumbria University
  • Lund University
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore
  • Cardiff University
  • University of Lausanne
  • Université Laval
  • Universidad de Magallanes
  • Capital Normal University
  • University of Gdańsk
  • Maseno University
  • University of Zambia
  • The University of Sydney
  • Institute of Applied Psychology
  • Centro de investigación del Seminario de Sociopsicoanálisis
  • Simon Fraser University
  • Nantes Université
  • Tampere University
  • Murdoch University
  • University of Notre Dame Australia
  • King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women
  • Teikyo University
  • SUNY Polytechnic Institute
  • King's College London
  • Universidad de Talca
  • Purdue University
  • University of Bari
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • Sant Pere Claver - Fundació Sanitària
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica En Red de Salud Mental
  • University of Seville
  • University of Pavia
  • University of Calgary
  • University of California
  • University of Cambridge
  • Leiden University
  • University of Montreal
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • University of Wuppertal
  • Reichman University
  • Yale University
  • Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • Tulane University
  • University of Delaware

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

139 Scopus citations

Abstract

Attachment theory and research are drawn upon in many applied settings, including family courts, but misunderstandings are widespread and sometimes result in misapplications. The aim of this consensus statement is, therefore, to enhance understanding, counter misinformation, and steer family-court utilisation of attachment theory in a supportive, evidence-based direction, especially with regard to child protection and child custody decision-making. This article is divided into two parts. In the first part, we address problems related to the use of attachment theory and research in family courts, and discuss reasons for these problems. To this end, we examine family court applications of attachment theory in the current context of the best-interest-of-the-child standard, discuss misunderstandings regarding attachment theory, and identify factors that have hindered accurate implementation. In the second part, we provide recommendations for the application of attachment theory and research. To this end, we set out three attachment principles: the child's need for familiar, non-abusive caregivers; the value of continuity of good-enough care; and the benefits of networks of attachment relationships. We also discuss the suitability of assessments of attachment quality and caregiving behaviour to inform family court decision-making. We conclude that assessments of caregiver behaviour should take center stage. Although there is dissensus among us regarding the use of assessments of attachment quality to inform child custody and child-protection decisions, such assessments are currently most suitable for targeting and directing supportive interventions. Finally, we provide directions to guide future interdisciplinary research collaboration.

Translated title of the contributionAttachment goes to court: Child protection and custody issues
Original languageSpanish
JournalAnuario de Psicologia Juridica
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

Keywords

  • Attachment theory
  • Best interests of the child
  • Child custody
  • Child protection
  • Consensus statement
  • Family court

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Attachment goes to court: Child protection and custody issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this