Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Empirical Bayesian estimation in graphical analysis: A voxel-based approach for the determination of the volume of distribution in PET studies

  • Francesca Zanderigo
  • , R. Todd Ogden
  • , Alessandra Bertoldo
  • , Claudio Cobelli
  • , J. John Mann
  • , Ramin V. Parsey
  • Columbia University
  • University of Padua

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Total volume of distribution (VT) determined by graphical analysis (GA) of PET data suffers from a noise-dependent bias. Likelihood estimation in GA (LEGA) eliminates this bias at the region of interest (ROI) level, but at voxel noise levels, the variance of estimators is high, yielding noisy images. We hypothesized that incorporating LEGA VT estimation in a Bayesian framework would shrink estimators towards prior means, reducing variability and producing meaningful and useful voxel images. Methods: Empirical Bayesian estimation in GA (EBEGA) determines prior distributions using a two-step k-means clustering of voxel activity. Results obtained on eight [11C]-DASB studies are compared with estimators computed by ROI-based LEGA. Results: EBEGA reproduces the results obtained by ROI LEGA while providing low-variability VT images. Correlation coefficients between average EBEGA VT and corresponding ROI LEGA VT range from 0.963 to 0.994. Conclusions: EBEGA is a fully automatic and general approach that can be applied to voxel-level VT image creation and to any modeling strategy to reduce voxel-level estimation variability without prefiltering of the PET data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443-451
Number of pages9
JournalNuclear Medicine and Biology
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Keywords

  • Bayes
  • Clustering
  • Likelihood
  • Logan
  • Serotonin
  • Voxel

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Empirical Bayesian estimation in graphical analysis: A voxel-based approach for the determination of the volume of distribution in PET studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this