Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Enhancement of oxidative dehydrogenation over cerium-doped nickel niobium catalysts and analysis of batch-to-batch variability

  • Conner J. Nelson
  • , Justin L. Park
  • , Colin Smith
  • , Adam Smith
  • , Andrew Bishop
  • , Caleb Boyack
  • , Lindsey Sanders
  • , Stacey J. Smith
  • , Kaifeng Zheng
  • , Yuanyuan Li
  • , Anatoly I. Frenkel
  • , Morris D. Argyle
  • , Kara J. Stowers
  • Brigham Young University
  • Stony Brook University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Nickel based catalysts are inexpensive and efficient for use in the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane. NiO doped with niobium and cerium shows increased ethylene production. Small amounts of Ce doped onto a NiNb catalyst led to increased Ni activity. The catalyst that had the highest ethylene production rate per g of catalyst had 1 atom% Ce, 86 at% Ni, and 13 at% Nb (1CeNiNb) while, if surface area is incorporated into the calculation, the catalyst that had the highest ethylene production rate per m2 was the 0.5CeNiNb catalyst. The ethylene production rates of these Ce-containing catalysts are 27 %–127 % higher than those with NiNb alone previously reported in the literature. To fully understand how cerium affects the NiNb catalyst, the Ce content and effect on active sites has been fully characterized over multiple batches. In doing this, light has been shed on batch-to-batch variability. Characterization techniques such as powder X-ray diffraction, hydrogen temperature programmed reduction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and methanol adsorption were used.

Original languageEnglish
Article number116577
JournalJournal of Catalysis
Volume454
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2026

Keywords

  • Catalysis
  • Cerium
  • Ethane
  • Nickel
  • Niobium
  • Oxidative dehydrogenation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enhancement of oxidative dehydrogenation over cerium-doped nickel niobium catalysts and analysis of batch-to-batch variability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this