Abstract
Socio-technical governance has been of long-standing interest to science and technology studies and science policy studies. Recent calls for midstream modulation direct attention to a more complicated model of innovation, and a new place for social scientists to intervene in research, design and development. This paper develops and expands this earlier work to demonstrate how a suite of concepts from science and technology studies and innovation studies can be used as a heuristic tool to conduct real-time evaluation and reflection during the process of innovation – upstream, midstream, and downstream. The result of this new protocol is inclusivity mainstreaming: determining if and how marginalized peoples and perspectives are being maximally incorporated into the model of innovation, while highlighting common problems of inequality that need to be addressed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 453-477 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Minerva |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2019 |
Keywords
- Evaluation and reflection
- Inclusivity mainstreaming
- Inequality
- Innovation
- Policy
- Poverty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Enhancing Socio-technical Governance: Targeting Inequality in Innovation Through Inclusivity Mainstreaming'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver