Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)

A. J. Shajib; S. Birrer; T. Treu; M. W. Auger; A. Agnello; T. Anguita; E. J. Buckley-Geer; J. H.H. Chan; T. E. Collett; F. Courbin; C. D. Fassnacht; J. Frieman; I. Kayo; C. Lemon; H. Lin; P. J. Marshall; R. McMahon; A. More; N. D. Morgan; V. Motta; M. Oguri; F. Ostrovski; C. E. Rusu; P. L. Schechter; T. Shanks; S. H. Suyu; G. Meylan; T. M.C. Abbott; S. Allam; J. Annis; S. Avila; E. Bertin; D. Brooks; A. Carnero Rosell; M. Carrasco Kind; J. Carretero; C. E. Cunha; L. N. Da Costa; J. De Vicente; S. Desai; P. Doel; B. Flaugher; P. Fosalba; J. García-Bellido; D. W. Gerdes; D. Gruen; R. A. Gruendl; G. Gutierrez; W. G. Hartley; D. L. Hollowood; B. Hoyle; D. J. James; K. Kuehn; N. Kuropatkin; O. Lahav; M. Lima; M. A.G. Maia; M. March; J. L. Marshall; P. Melchior; F. Menanteau; R. Miquel; A. A. Plazas; E. Sanchez; V. Scarpine; I. Sevilla-Noarbe; M. Smith; M. Soares-Santos; F. Sobreira; E. Suchyta; M. E.C. Swanson; G. Tarle; A. R. Walker

doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3562

Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)

A. J. Shajib
, S. Birrer
, T. Treu
, M. W. Auger
, A. Agnello
, T. Anguita
, E. J. Buckley-Geer
, J. H.H. Chan
, T. E. Collett
, F. Courbin
, C. D. Fassnacht
, J. Frieman
, I. Kayo
, C. Lemon
, H. Lin
, P. J. Marshall
, R. McMahon
, A. More
, N. D. Morgan
, V. Motta

M. Oguri, F. Ostrovski, C. E. Rusu, P. L. Schechter, T. Shanks, S. H. Suyu, G. Meylan, T. M.C. Abbott, S. Allam, J. Annis, S. Avila, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, C. E. Cunha, L. N. Da Costa, J. De Vicente, S. Desai, P. Doel, B. Flaugher, P. Fosalba, J. García-Bellido, D. W. Gerdes, D. Gruen, R. A. Gruendl, G. Gutierrez, W. G. Hartley, D. L. Hollowood, B. Hoyle, D. J. James, K. Kuehn, N. Kuropatkin, O. Lahav, M. Lima, M. A.G. Maia, M. March, J. L. Marshall, P. Melchior, F. Menanteau, R. Miquel, A. A. Plazas, E. Sanchez, V. Scarpine, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, M. Smith, M. Soares-Santos, F. Sobreira, E. Suchyta, M. E.C. Swanson, G. Tarle, A. R. Walker

Physics and Astronomy

University of California at Los Angeles
University of Cambridge
European Southern Observatory
Universidad Andrés Bello
Millennium Institute of Astrophysics
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne
University of Portsmouth
University of California at Davis
The University of Chicago
Tokyo University of Technology
Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
The University of Tokyo
Staples High School
Universidad de Valparaíso
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Durham University
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
Technical University of Munich
Academia Sinica - Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics
National Optical Astronomy Observatory
Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris
Sorbonne Université
University College London
Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia
Observatório Nacional
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Institute for High Energy Physics
Stanford University
CIEMAT
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad
Institute of Space Studies of Catalonia
CSIC
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
University of California at Santa Cruz
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. Astrophys.
Australian Astronomical Observatory
Universidade de São Paulo
University of Pennsylvania
Texas A&M University
Princeton University
ICREA
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
University of Southampton
Brandeis University
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The paper 'Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars' was published inMNRAS, 483, 4, 5649-5671 (2019). The coordinate values of the image positions in table 4 were wrongly printed due to a clerical error. At a later stage of writing the manuscript, we have changed the zero-point definition of the lens coordinate systems, but the relative image positions were not accounted for this change of definition while printing out table 4. We provide the updated Table 4 below. This error does not impact any other results of the paper in any way, except for the table itself. We thank Collin Werner and Paul Schechter for helping us identify this error.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2833-2835
Number of pages	3
Journal	Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume	501
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3562
State	Published - Feb 1 2021

Keywords

errata, addenda
galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD
galaxies: structure
gravitational lensing: strong
methods: data analysis

Access to Document

10.1093/mnras/staa3562

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Shajib, A. J., Birrer, S., Treu, T., Auger, M. W., Agnello, A., Anguita, T., Buckley-Geer, E. J., Chan, J. H. H., Collett, T. E., Courbin, F., Fassnacht, C. D., Frieman, J., Kayo, I., Lemon, C., Lin, H., Marshall, P. J., McMahon, R., More, A., Morgan, N. D., ... Walker, A. R. (2021). Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 501(2), 2833-2835. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3562

Shajib, A. J. ; Birrer, S. ; Treu, T. et al. / Erratum : Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397). In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2021 ; Vol. 501, No. 2. pp. 2833-2835.

@article{85a4301c4cca4a8e9a09a9d36d3470f6,

title = "Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649{\textendash}5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)",

abstract = "The paper 'Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars' was published inMNRAS, 483, 4, 5649-5671 (2019). The coordinate values of the image positions in table 4 were wrongly printed due to a clerical error. At a later stage of writing the manuscript, we have changed the zero-point definition of the lens coordinate systems, but the relative image positions were not accounted for this change of definition while printing out table 4. We provide the updated Table 4 below. This error does not impact any other results of the paper in any way, except for the table itself. We thank Collin Werner and Paul Schechter for helping us identify this error.",

keywords = "errata, addenda, galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: structure, gravitational lensing: strong, methods: data analysis",

author = "Shajib, \{A. J.\} and S. Birrer and T. Treu and Auger, \{M. W.\} and A. Agnello and T. Anguita and Buckley-Geer, \{E. J.\} and Chan, \{J. H.H.\} and Collett, \{T. E.\} and F. Courbin and Fassnacht, \{C. D.\} and J. Frieman and I. Kayo and C. Lemon and H. Lin and Marshall, \{P. J.\} and R. McMahon and A. More and Morgan, \{N. D.\} and V. Motta and M. Oguri and F. Ostrovski and Rusu, \{C. E.\} and Schechter, \{P. L.\} and T. Shanks and Suyu, \{S. H.\} and G. Meylan and Abbott, \{T. M.C.\} and S. Allam and J. Annis and S. Avila and E. Bertin and D. Brooks and \{Carnero Rosell\}, A. and \{Carrasco Kind\}, M. and J. Carretero and Cunha, \{C. E.\} and \{Da Costa\}, \{L. N.\} and \{De Vicente\}, J. and S. Desai and P. Doel and B. Flaugher and P. Fosalba and J. Garc{\'i}a-Bellido and Gerdes, \{D. W.\} and D. Gruen and Gruendl, \{R. A.\} and G. Gutierrez and Hartley, \{W. G.\} and Hollowood, \{D. L.\} and B. Hoyle and James, \{D. J.\} and K. Kuehn and N. Kuropatkin and O. Lahav and M. Lima and Maia, \{M. A.G.\} and M. March and Marshall, \{J. L.\} and P. Melchior and F. Menanteau and R. Miquel and Plazas, \{A. A.\} and E. Sanchez and V. Scarpine and I. Sevilla-Noarbe and M. Smith and M. Soares-Santos and F. Sobreira and E. Suchyta and Swanson, \{M. E.C.\} and G. Tarle and Walker, \{A. R.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s).",

year = "2021",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/mnras/staa3562",

language = "English",

volume = "501",

pages = "2833--2835",

journal = "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society",

issn = "0035-8711",

number = "2",

}

Shajib, AJ, Birrer, S, Treu, T, Auger, MW, Agnello, A, Anguita, T, Buckley-Geer, EJ, Chan, JHH, Collett, TE, Courbin, F, Fassnacht, CD, Frieman, J, Kayo, I, Lemon, C, Lin, H, Marshall, PJ, McMahon, R, More, A, Morgan, ND, Motta, V, Oguri, M, Ostrovski, F, Rusu, CE, Schechter, PL, Shanks, T, Suyu, SH, Meylan, G, Abbott, TMC, Allam, S, Annis, J, Avila, S, Bertin, E, Brooks, D, Carnero Rosell, A, Carrasco Kind, M, Carretero, J, Cunha, CE, Da Costa, LN, De Vicente, J, Desai, S, Doel, P, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, García-Bellido, J, Gerdes, DW, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Gutierrez, G, Hartley, WG, Hollowood, DL, Hoyle, B, James, DJ, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lahav, O, Lima, M, Maia, MAG, March, M, Marshall, JL, Melchior, P, Menanteau, F, Miquel, R, Plazas, AA, Sanchez, E, Scarpine, V, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Smith, M, Soares-Santos, M, Sobreira, F, Suchyta, E, Swanson, MEC, Tarle, G & Walker, AR 2021, 'Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 501, no. 2, pp. 2833-2835. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3562

Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397). / Shajib, A. J.; Birrer, S.; Treu, T. et al.
In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 501, No. 2, 01.02.2021, p. 2833-2835.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)

AU - Shajib, A. J.

AU - Birrer, S.

AU - Treu, T.

AU - Auger, M. W.

AU - Agnello, A.

AU - Anguita, T.

AU - Buckley-Geer, E. J.

AU - Chan, J. H.H.

AU - Collett, T. E.

AU - Courbin, F.

AU - Fassnacht, C. D.

AU - Frieman, J.

AU - Kayo, I.

AU - Lemon, C.

AU - Lin, H.

AU - Marshall, P. J.

AU - McMahon, R.

AU - More, A.

AU - Morgan, N. D.

AU - Motta, V.

AU - Oguri, M.

AU - Ostrovski, F.

AU - Rusu, C. E.

AU - Schechter, P. L.

AU - Shanks, T.

AU - Suyu, S. H.

AU - Meylan, G.

AU - Abbott, T. M.C.

AU - Allam, S.

AU - Annis, J.

AU - Avila, S.

AU - Bertin, E.

AU - Brooks, D.

AU - Carnero Rosell, A.

AU - Carrasco Kind, M.

AU - Carretero, J.

AU - Cunha, C. E.

AU - Da Costa, L. N.

AU - De Vicente, J.

AU - Desai, S.

AU - Doel, P.

AU - Flaugher, B.

AU - Fosalba, P.

AU - García-Bellido, J.

AU - Gerdes, D. W.

AU - Gruen, D.

AU - Gruendl, R. A.

AU - Gutierrez, G.

AU - Hartley, W. G.

AU - Hollowood, D. L.

AU - Hoyle, B.

AU - James, D. J.

AU - Kuehn, K.

AU - Kuropatkin, N.

AU - Lahav, O.

AU - Lima, M.

AU - Maia, M. A.G.

AU - March, M.

AU - Marshall, J. L.

AU - Melchior, P.

AU - Menanteau, F.

AU - Miquel, R.

AU - Plazas, A. A.

AU - Sanchez, E.

AU - Scarpine, V.

AU - Sevilla-Noarbe, I.

AU - Smith, M.

AU - Soares-Santos, M.

AU - Sobreira, F.

AU - Suchyta, E.

AU - Swanson, M. E.C.

AU - Tarle, G.

AU - Walker, A. R.

PY - 2021/2/1

Y1 - 2021/2/1

N2 - The paper 'Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars' was published inMNRAS, 483, 4, 5649-5671 (2019). The coordinate values of the image positions in table 4 were wrongly printed due to a clerical error. At a later stage of writing the manuscript, we have changed the zero-point definition of the lens coordinate systems, but the relative image positions were not accounted for this change of definition while printing out table 4. We provide the updated Table 4 below. This error does not impact any other results of the paper in any way, except for the table itself. We thank Collin Werner and Paul Schechter for helping us identify this error.

AB - The paper 'Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars' was published inMNRAS, 483, 4, 5649-5671 (2019). The coordinate values of the image positions in table 4 were wrongly printed due to a clerical error. At a later stage of writing the manuscript, we have changed the zero-point definition of the lens coordinate systems, but the relative image positions were not accounted for this change of definition while printing out table 4. We provide the updated Table 4 below. This error does not impact any other results of the paper in any way, except for the table itself. We thank Collin Werner and Paul Schechter for helping us identify this error.

KW - errata, addenda

KW - galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD

KW - galaxies: structure

KW - gravitational lensing: strong

KW - methods: data analysis

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85100451513

U2 - 10.1093/mnras/staa3562

DO - 10.1093/mnras/staa3562

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85100451513

SN - 0035-8711

VL - 501

SP - 2833

EP - 2835

JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

IS - 2

ER -

Shajib AJ, Birrer S, Treu T, Auger MW, Agnello A, Anguita T et al. Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2021 Feb 1;501(2):2833-2835. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3562

Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this